Commentary
Cell Phone Fees OK For Consumers, Not Government
I hate early termination fees. Big shock, I know. But what's even more infuriating is seeing reports that Sprint didn't charge government subscribers an ETF because "the government will never, never accept such penalty amounts."I hate early termination fees. Big shock, I know. But what's even more infuriating is seeing reports that Sprint didn't charge government subscribers an ETF because "the government will never, never accept such penalty amounts."Consumer anger already is reaching a boiling point with a few lawsuits already being filed, and these leaked confidential e-mails by the AP show then-Nextel marketing VP Scott Wiener saying that customers' complaints are real.
AT&T and Verizon Wireless already have made some adjustments to their ETFs, and the FCC is currently mulling a nationwide policy. For some reason, I just don't think we need the FCC's help on this, just some common sense.
More Mobility Insights
White Papers
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Reports
- Mobility’s Next Challenge: 8 Steps to a Secure Environment
- Time to Move: How to Ensure 'Mobility' Translates to 'Agility'
Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- The ABC's of Cloud Computing in the Midmarket
The refrain from carriers is that they have to charge these fees because many handsets are subsidized. While some buy their own phones outright (particularly the first iPhone), the majority of consumers still get their phones free or at a carrier discount. Because of this, I'm not completely opposed to an ETF.
But not all subsidies are equal. Carriers should simply adjust the ETF according to how much of a discount they got for the handset. If you brought your own handset to the party, then you shouldn't be charged.
Additionally, Verizon and AT&T are reducing the cost of living depending on how long you've been under contract and that's a step in the right direction.
What do you think? Are the ETFs shady, or is it the consumer's fault for signing a contract they don't understand? I mean, even if you can't get the latest and greatest phone, there are options to get mobile service without a contract.
How would you fix early termination fees?
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Featured Resource
This white paper focuses on the critical need to manage outbound content sent via various avenues including email, Instant Messages, text messages, tweets, and Facebook posts. Read More












