Commentary

Google's 'GPhone' Delayed Until 2009

Before you get all bent out of shape, it's worth pointing out that the GPhone and Android (Google's Linux-based smartphone operating system) are two entirely separate things. Was anyone waiting for the actual GPhone, anyway?

Before you get all bent out of shape, it's worth pointing out that the GPhone and Android (Google's Linux-based smartphone operating system) are two entirely separate things. Was anyone waiting for the actual GPhone, anyway?Prior to Google's big announcement about Android and the Open Handset Alliance, many believed that Google was hard at work developing an actual Google Phone, or GPhone. The phone was supposed to be a serious competitor with Apple's iPhone. Those beliefs were pretty much dashed when Android and the OHA came to light. Rumors persisted here and there, but for the most part, people began to believe that known hardware manufacturers, such as HTC, were the ones building official Android-powered "GPhones".

In fact, just last week Google engineer Steve Horowitz declared at Google's I/O conference that there will be no GPhone.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

So why, then, is TheStreet reporting that the GPhone is delayed until 2009? TheStreet's Gary Krakow reports, "Despite a lot of advanced hype, the soon-to-be rescuer of the smartphone industry may not be able to join the fray until sometime in 2009. According to a source familiar with the situation, although a large number of people are hard at work on the Gphone and the open-source operating system/platform for mobile devices (Android), the actual Gphone will not be ready for release this year... The source would not speculate on the possibility that other devices that might run on variants of Android would be ready in time for the Christmas shopping season, nor would the source elaborate on exact reasons for the delay or a possible release date for the Gphone or various Android variants."

Um. OK. After a Google staffer goes out of his way to publicly state that the GPhone doesn't exist, it is sort of weird for someone to tell a reporter that it won't be available until next year.

Another curiosity is that the source wouldn't discuss the possibility of other handsets running on "variants" of Android. HTC has committed to release one or two Android-powered handsets this year, and has even named one of them the Dream Phone. I have to wonder about how familiar this source really is with Google's plans.

Personally, I won't be waiting until 2009 to pick up an Android-powered phone. I'll be first in line to buy HTC's Dream Phone when it becomes available.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links