The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Over The Air

Topics:   Mobile

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Would More Megapixels Make The iPhone's Camera Worse?


Posted by Eric Zeman, Jun 19, 2008 09:05 AM

There's an interesting article over at Ars Technica about how boosting the number of megapixels in the iPhone's camera would lead to worse picture quality. The author explores the things that really matter: autofocus and lens quality. For the most part, I agree with his analysis, but Apple still could have improved the camera.


Last week I wrote a short piece titled "Five Reasons NOT To Buy The 3G iPhone." Thank you to the many, many people who agreed and/or disagreed with the article and, further, who took the time to e-mail me about the story. One of the reasons I listed was that Apple took no steps to improve the camera.

Many of you assumed I meant for Apple to boost the number of megapixels the iPhone's camera has. While that would have been a nice gesture, it is far from the only thing that would improve the quality of images taken with the iPhone.

On megapixels, Ars says:

If Apple were to use a higher resolution image sensor with the same lens, the pictures wouldn't be any sharper -- and 2MP sharpness in a 5MP camera is just not acceptable. The other option would be to reduce the size of the lens opening, but that way, the amount of light that reaches the sensor is reduced and the iPhone would have an even harder time taking decent photos under dim lighting. The other problem is that the more megapixels that are crammed in the same size sensor, the smaller those pixels get. Since individual pixels are gathering less light, many will be "underexposed" and produce a lot more noise. That's the last thing that the iPhone's camera needs.

He's absolutely right. Simply boosting the number of megapixels would result in images of poorer quality. If Apple really wanted to improve the camera, it would have done a few things: add autofocus, improve the lens quality, add a flash, and add better camera software.

The first three would definitely result in a phone with a higher price tag, and possibly even an altered size/shape. Autofocus camera chips tend to be a bit thicker than fixed-focus lenses. Depending on how Apple engineered the guts of the device, this could have resulted in a bulge, or other change in the shape of the iPhone. My guess is Apple didn't want to take that route.

Better software, on the other hand, is something Apple could easily have done, and without impacting the price of the iPhone too much. As it is, the iPhone has zero ability to configure or change the settings for the camera. All you can do is point, and shoot. Sure, this ease-of-use factor is classic Apple thinking at work, but many (myself included) like to be able to make adjustments such as dial down the resolution, have some control over image size, crop the image, check for the right white balance setting, and so on. Apple must be assuming that iPhone users will use iPhoto (other other photo-editing software) to make those adjustments after the fact. The truth is, sometimes it would be nice to perform those actions on the phone, because you're going to send the photo to someone else directly from the phone.

As I mentioned in my article last week, I am hoping a third-party developer steps up to the plate and delivers software to do just this.

« Make Your Own Worm | Main | Red Hat In Boston, Part 1.2: In Open Source, You Can't Be Half-Pregnant »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Mobile Video


Sign Up For The Over The Air Newsletter
Every Friday, our experts and analysts explore the business, strategy, and management issues most important to mobile and wireless technology.

Sign up for our free, weekly newsletter today!

Newsletter Archives


 

  1. Sequential Programming: Like Eating Peas with a Straw.
  2. Biomolecular device using self-assembled DNA nanostructures?
  3. Coreinfo v2.0: A Simple Utility to Understand the Manycore Complexity in Windows


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. More Reasons Why Linux Misses The Desktop
  2. Too Much Netbook For Too Litl?
  3. Verizon: $350 ETF Is A Go
  4. Motorola Explains Why Droid Doesn't Have Multi-Touch


  1. Florida Hospital Dials Up iPhones For Nurses
  2. Is Antivirus Software Dead?
  3. Securing The Cyber Supply Chain
  4. CIO Profiles: Christopher Rence, Chief Information And Business Transformation Officer Of FICO
  5. InformationWeek Analytics Research: Federated Search
  6. Practical Analysis: The Fastest-Growing Security Threat

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007