Commentary
Another Open Source Feather In Microsoft's Cap
My colleague Dave Methvin jumped on the news about Microsoft's use of the jQuery library before I did, but it has to be said: it's something that says as much about the state of open source as it does about Microsoft. Most of it positive, actually.
My colleague Dave Methvin jumped on the news about Microsoft's use of the jQuery library before I did, but it has to be said: it's something that says as much about the state of open source as it does about Microsoft. Most of it positive, actually.
More Software Insights
White Papers
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
- New Visual and Wizard-Driven Paradigms for Exploring Data and Developing Analytic Workflows
Reports
More >>Webcasts
- Maximize ROI with Database Consolidation onto Private Clouds
- Outsourcing Security: What Every Potential Cloud Security Customer Should Know
Obviously, it's good news for open source -- one of open source's most widely employed Web resources, a JavaScript library that takes a lot of the heavy lifting out of developing Ajax sites. It's also good news for Microsoft because it gets positive attention from developers (many of them at the very least FOSS-friendly) who've long suffered from Microsoft's compulsively maverick way of doing, well, everything.
This is one of many steps Microsoft needs to take to undo the damage it did to Web standards over the past decade-plus, and earn back some good will. Using and contributing back to an existing project in the above sphere (Web standards) rather than trying to go it alone and expecting everyone else to fall in line is a solid step in that direction.
The one thing that I do not see changing, however, is Microsoft's sense of animosity toward Linux. Microsoft may be softening its stance toward open source and making itself a friendlier player in that regard, but its stance toward Linux certainly hasn't softened.
What might happen -- and this would be all for the better -- is to have Microsoft cast that rivalry more in the terms of one platform vs. another. Make it more like the way Windows competes with the Mac, rather than it being one development or licensing model vs. another. And it doesn't even have to be because Microsoft is trying to be a nice guy. It's just easier to compete with something specific -- like Red Hat or MySQL -- than to compete with "open source" or "Linux" generally.
Still, congrats to the jQuery gang, and kudos to Microsoft for doing the non-evil thing. Heck, at this rate, if the next version of Office uses ODF by default, I might end up losing a bet.
Related Reading
| To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy. | |
|
|
T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting! |
Subscribe to RSSResource Links
This Week's Issue
Technology Whitepapers
- Mobile BI: Actionable Intelligence for the Agile Enterprise
- Creating the Enterprise-Class Tablet Environment - by Yankee Group
- How To Regain IT Control In An Increasingly Mobile World - by BlackBerry
- The BlackBerry PlayBook tablet's Good Bones - by BlackBerry
- Red Alert: Why Tablet Security Matters - by BlackBerry
Featured Broadcast
This white paper explains how to create a manageable, scalable environment suited to answer real-time business needs by building out a data center on a standards-based, virtualization-aware, energy-efficient and affordable platform. Plus, learn how virtualization is making the jump from the server realm into the application, mobile and database worlds in the additional resources section.
Learn More












