The InformationWeek -- Blogs

Backup and Business Continuity Blog

Topics:   Backup and Business Continuity

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Nevada Law Requires Encryption - Vendor Press Release Exaggerates When


Posted by Howard Marks, Oct 13, 2008 05:04 PM

A new Nevada law (NRS 597.970) effective Oct. 1 requires that businesses in Nevada encrypt personal information whenever it is electronically transmitted outside the business by any means other than fax. Predictably, I got a press release from an encryption software vendor that said "Even if a business never sends customer information via e-mail, the business will be at risk if a server, desktop, laptop, or electronic storage device is lost, stolen, or compromised." The real problem is the law is incredibly vague.


According to Nevada law, personal information means your name and any of the following:

1. Social Security number.
2. Driver's license number or identification card number.
3. Account number, credit card number, or debit card number, in combination with any required security code, access code, or password that would permit access to the person's financial account.

Electronic transmission isn't defined, so one interpretation would include the telephone -- so if you forget the password to your online banking account, your bank will have to snail mail or fax you a new one. It does say "to a person outside of the secure system of the business," so you don't have to run out and encrypt all your disks like the vendor that brought this to my attention would like.

The law makes violations a misdemeanor but doesn't specify any penalties.

Since this is the backup blog, this law just reinforces the recommendation to encrypt any backup that's going to leave the data center. Encrypt your tapes, and use an online backup application that encrypts data in flight and at rest in someone else's data center.

« Mobile Firefox One Step Closer to Release | Main | Google Competitor Uses Google Tech To Take E-Mail Offline »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Detecting Scalability Problems With Intel Parallel Universe Portal
  2. Just Say No To SFAQL Parallelism
  3. QuickThread: A New C++ Multicore Library


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


                           


  1. Thoughts On The Motorola Droid
  2. Specs For Next Motorola Android Phone Leak
  3. Encryption Is Cloud Computing Security Savior


  1. Microsoft Bing Cashback Not Always A Bargain
  2. Google Buys Ad Start-Up Teracent
  3. Feds Launch Health IT Blog
  4. Full Nelson: Video: San Francisco Goes Open, Transparent
  5. AOL Previews Brand, Trims Workforce
  6. Physicians Question Health IT Stimulus Requirements

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007