Commentary

George Hulme
 

Chinese Hackers Repeatedly Hack White House Network

The Financial Times is reporting that Chinese hackers have repeatedly nabbed e-mails between government officials.

The Financial Times is reporting that Chinese hackers have repeatedly nabbed e-mails between government officials.Earlier this year, Chinese officials rebuked claims that any attacks aimed at federal systems were launched by government-backed Chinese hackers. However, an unnamed U.S. government official has this to say to the Financial Times:

"We are getting very targeted Chinese attacks so it stretches credulity that these are not directed by government-related organisations," said the official.

More Security Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The National Cyber Investigative Joint Task Force, a unit established in 2007 to tackle security, detected the attacks. The official stressed the hackers had accessed only the unclassified computer network, and not the more secure classified network.

"For a short period of time, they successfully breach a wall, and then you rebuild the wall . . . it is not as if they have continued access," said the official. "It is constant cat and mouse on this stuff."

Government, and corporate-sponsored, hackers are a growing concern. What makes them potentially more dangerous is that governments and corporations have deep pockets, can hire teams of specialists, and can afford to keep knocking away at a network, dumpster dive for documents, social engineer, maybe even work an employee or contractor to hand over data -- eventually they'll get in.

Last week, a U.K. IT security defense leader warned that U.K. interests were under steady attack. While last month, a Government Accountability Office's report found the federal government's IT security to be wanting.

When you have a motivated attacker targeting a disjointed, unfocused defender, it doesn't take a genius to deduce the outcome.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links