Commentary

Allen Stern
 

I'd Buy That Twitter For A Dollar

The question going around the early adopter circle this week is whether Twitter users would pay for their accounts and if so, how much would they be willing to pay. Rob Jensen has analyzed a survey which shows that most people who replied would rather see the service go away than pay for it.

The question going around the early adopter circle this week is whether Twitter users would pay for their accounts and if so, how much would they be willing to pay. Rob Jensen has analyzed a survey which shows that most people who replied would rather see the service go away than pay for it.From my perspective, if Twitter was about sharing business information and ideas, I'd be more open to payment. But there's no way I am paying to read what someone had for lunch or that they are on their way to Cancun.

Twitter monetization is a topic I've written about several times before. As Twitter grows, its monetization troubles keep compounding. In fact, check out Twitterific, which charges $15 for its Twitter client. While not a complete monetization model, I could see brands "buying" interested users and creating the new opt-in mailing list. Take online shoe retailer Zappos, for example -- it has a very popular Twitter account. It would pay a fee for each person who is following its account.


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Another option for Twitter to consider is selling words within tweets, similar to the Kontera and Intellitxt programs. Let's assume Apple bought the keyword for iPod and a person mentions iPod in one of their tweets -- a link would be created over the word iPod which would link to the Apple site. Twitter could set up the words using an auction model and as long as there is a good time-management system in place, the ads could work. The issue with this concept is that so many of Twitter's users are using the service with third-party applications. These third-party applications will pose an issue for most monetization models that Twitter considers.

If Twitter does decide to offer paid accounts, the paid accounts have to be able to offer enough value to make the purchase price worth it. In addition, the purchase price has to be enough to (at a minimum) cover the costs associated with the usage. While it's easy to suggest that a Web application has no real costs, Twitter has SMS and other fees (which continue to increase).

You might be wondering if I would pay for Twitter. The answer is most likely not. If it moves to a paid model, so many users will leave and the investment won't return enough value. I believe the corporate opt-in plan suggested above is still the best initial revenue model for Twitter.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links