Commentary

Serdar Yegulalp
 

Open Source: Broken Model Or Breaking The Mold?

Much of the analysis of open source business models seems schizoid: it's either the greatest thing since sliced bread or the worst thing since ... you get the idea. The truth is, of course, somewhere in the middle, but in what form?

Much of the analysis of open source business models seems schizoid: it's either the greatest thing since sliced bread or the worst thing since ... you get the idea. The truth is, of course, somewhere in the middle, but in what form?


More Software Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

In a piece for BusinessWeek, "Open Source: The Model Is Broken", OSDL CEO Stuart Cohen lays out his take on the limits of businesses that use open source as their revenue stream:

Companies have long hoped to make money from this freely available software by charging customers for support and add-on features. Some have succeeded. Many others have failed or will falter, and their ranks may swell as the economy worsens. This will require many to adopt a new mindset, viewing open source more as a means than an end in itself.

From what I've seen, the open source business folks who do get it -- the Red Hats and the SugarCRMs -- have had that mentality for a long time. It's just plain old business savvy; it's not some magical fairy dust sprinkled on top of the business. The PC industry deals with its wafer-thin margins in a whole slew of ways -- maintenance plans, preloaded software sales, services, and so on. Open source is no different in the abstract, although it can sure seem different.

Another thing to keep in mind is that most businesses, period, will fail no matter what their revenue model or product. If they sold and supported open source, they may well have failed for reasons that have nothing to do with that fact, or how well they did that specific thing.

Then I glanced back up at the article's tagline: "The open-source business model that relies solely on support and service revenue streams is failing to meet the expectations of investors." Emphasis on the last word is mine, since it shows what the gist of the whole article is really about: the suitability of open source companies as investment targets.

I never imagined using open source would lead to blockbuster business. I did imagine, though, that you could make a respectable profit from it, which for most people is more than enough to keep them busy.  One of the big ongoing lessons from all this is how "success" doesn't have to be defined by the sheer size of the enterprise -- something most of us have realized by now after even the most cursory glance at the latest financial headlines.


Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/syegulalp


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links