Commentary

Should AT&T Consolidate To One Smartphone Platform?

At a Symbian event in San Francisco this week, an AT&T exec suggested that the company would like to support only one smartphone operating system for a number of reasons. Could AT&T survive with just one smartphone platform?

At a Symbian event in San Francisco this week, an AT&T exec suggested that the company would like to support only one smartphone operating system for a number of reasons. Could AT&T survive with just one smartphone platform?The idea makes some sense from a business perspective. Were AT&T to actually ditch all but one platform, that means it could reduce support and development costs across the board. PC World reports, "The mobile operator believes smartphones will make up the largest portion of devices connecting to its network by about 2014, and it wants to avoid the fragmentation of platforms that has made it hard to develop mobile applications." That's understandable, but I think it would cause more problems than it solves.

Right now, AT&T offers phones running Windows Mobile, BlackBerry OS, Palm OS, and the iPhone. AT&T does offer a Nokia device that runs S60, but AT&T doesn't classify that device (or OS) as worthy of bearing the smartphone moniker. AT&T doesn't yet offer a phone running the Android OS. AT&T considers the iPhone a third-party device that just happens to use AT&T's wireless services, so don't think the iPhone is going away any time soon.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

How many of your businesses use AT&T and support both Windows Mobile and BlackBerry? Could you do without one or the other? What's more interesting is that the executive who made the comments, Roger Smith, director of next generation services, data product realization at AT&T, also said that the company considers Symbian the most likely candidate to fill that spot.

Wow. Really? AT&T has all-but-ignored Symbian completely, especially the S60 smartphone platform from Nokia. Where did this drastic reversal in thinking come from?

Has Nokia's strategic shift of buying out the Symbian Foundation, with plans to offer Symbian open source, changed AT&T's mind? It's too early to really know what the future of Symbian is going to offer, so why AT&T would bank everything on it raises eyebrows. Of course, this would be a major win for Nokia, which has hitherto seen its market share in the U.S. wither away the past few years. The developer base for Symbian is huge, but the platform needs to make major leaps and bounds in usability to catch up to the likes of iPhone OS, the newer BlackBerry OS, and feature phones that are besting smartphones in usability.

In the end, however, I don't think AT&T can live without Windows Mobile and BlackBerry, which are what the core of its enterprise users pick for their businesses.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links