The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

Over The Air

Topics:   Mobile

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

Should Camera Phones Be Required To 'Click'?


Posted by Eric Zeman, Jan 26, 2009 04:48 PM

Here's an interesting tidbit. A new bill has been put before Congress that would require camera phones to make a noise or "click" whenever they are used to take a picture. The idea is to make it clear to everyone in the vicinity that the camera phone is being use as a camera. Is this really necessary?


Lawmakers hope to thwart picture-taking evil-doers.

The Camera Phone Predator Alert Act "requires any mobile phone containing a digital camera to sound a tone whenever a photograph is taken with the camera's phone. Prohibits such a phone from being equipped with a means of disabling or silencing the tone. Treats the requirement as a consumer product safety standard and requires enforcement by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)."

Wow.

I am sure the lawmakers who wrote the bill are thinking of protecting children, and that's laudable. But is this the right way to do it?

Most phones I've tested that have cameras make noise when they take a picture. Users have to actively disable that sound. Many people don't bother. Same goes for point-and-shoot cameras. Most of them make a clicking noise when firing a shot. You have to go into the user settings if you want it to be quiet.

The prevalence of cameras in phones -- and the ability to silence them -- has surely led to those with a proclivity for taking advantage of people to do so. My mother, a school teacher, has told me how teens are using them to take inappropriate pictures of others in the bathroom and/or locker room at school. We've already seen reports on how teens use camera phones to take naughty pictures of themselves and then send them on to a boyfriend or girlfriend.

In a business setting, it is well known that cameras are not allowed in many work environments. Employees and/or visitors are sometimes required to check cell phones / cameras upon entering certain buildings or areas of buildings due to the risk that proprietary information -- or privacy -- may be compromised.

I've seen people attempting to take pictures on the sly many times, whether it be in bars, at trade shows, or wherever.

If camera phones are required to make a sound loud enough so everyone in a reasonable distance can hear it, it might cut down on the amount of abuse, but it won't change human nature.

« How To Succeed At Twitter | Main | Schwarzenegger's 'Restructuring' Plan Provides Comic -- Not Financial -- Relief »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
Mobile Video


Sign Up For The Over The Air Newsletter
Every Friday, our experts and analysts explore the business, strategy, and management issues most important to mobile and wireless technology.

Sign up for our free, weekly newsletter today!

Newsletter Archives


 

  1. Massive Parallelism Has a Name ... Extreme Scale Computing
  2. Intel Turbo Boost Technology Monitor: A Windows Gadget to Understand Dynamic Frequencies
  3. Two-Stage Input Parallel Pipeline: Part 2


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


  1. Google's Universal Translator
  2. Google Reduces Nexus One ETF, But Not Enough
  3. Google's Buzz Skips webOS?


  1. Microsoft Fixes 26 Vulnerabilities In Windows, Office
  2. Intel Ships Itanium Server Processor
  3. Commerce Department Proposes One-Stop Climate Service
  4. Microsoft Denies Windows 7 Battery Bug
  5. Google Buzz Challenges Facebook, Twitter
  6. Android, iPhone Gain In Smartphone Market

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007