Commentary

Google Vs. Symbian: 'My Linux Is More Open Than Your Linux'

It looks like a war of words has broken out between Google and the Symbian Foundation over which mobile platform is truly more open. Is there really a right answer to this debate?

It looks like a war of words has broken out between Google and the Symbian Foundation over which mobile platform is truly more open. Is there really a right answer to this debate?Speaking to Silicon.com, Symbian Foundation director Lee Williams said that Google's Android platform, which is based on Linux, isn't really what Google claims. "Android is not open. It's a marketing label. It's controlled by Google." The implication is that since one company still plays such a large role in its development, Android doesn't fully embrace the idea of openness. "It [should be] up to the community to take it where it wants to go."

Google didn't sit quietly by and let Symbian bash its mobile baby. During the recent Mobile World Congress trade show, Android co-founder and Google's VP of mobile, Rich Miner, said, "If you're talking about a platform and the source code isn't completely available for that platform, I would say it's misleading to call that platform open. Because that platform can't be adapted, changed, and shaped by the people who are consuming that platform -- the handset OEMs or the carriers. I'd say that if you need to join some sort of a club in order to get access to the source code -- so membership in some consortium or some other group -- then it really truly isn't open."


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

Miner was, of course, poking a finger at the Symbian Foundation. Companies that join the Symbian Foundation (spearheaded by Nokia) will have access to Symbian code for free (less the cost to join the foundation, of course -- currently $1,500.). In comparison, Android's base code is free. You or I or anyone could download the complete platform right now without the need to join any sort of foundation, alliance, or organization.

The foundation's Williams also added that fracturing the flavors of Linux -- especially for mobile -- is a bad plan. He said the only reason Google's Android has support is because Google is such a large and well-known company. Google's Miner retorted that Android offers a lot more than other mobile Linux platforms and reiterated Google's belief that Android will unite mobile Linux, not further divide it.

There are likely strong arguments on both sides of this debate. In the end, what both the Symbian Foundation and the Open Handset Alliance need to do is bring capable, feature-rich platforms to market on hardware that people will want to buy. The Symbian Foundation already counts Nokia -- the world's largest supplier of mobile handsets -- as its major manufacturing partner. Whatever future version of S60 -- if it is even called S60 -- powers Nokia's handsets will be born of Symbian Foundation code.

Google and its OHA partners are still working to refine Android, though it already is in the market. HTC has backed up Google with the G1 and Magic. Other companies, such as Samsung, Huawei, and Motorola, have announced the intent to release their own Android handsets in the future.

We'll be waiting.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links