Commentary

Michael Hickins
 

Why We Tweet

I found myself explaining Twitter to my best friend, an architect in New York City, who despite being worldly, erudite and smart, was completely at a loss as to why he should even care about Twitter, much less incorporate it into his crazily busy life.

I found myself explaining Twitter to my best friend, an architect in New York City, who despite being worldly, erudite and smart, was completely at a loss as to why he should even care about Twitter, much less incorporate it into his crazily busy life.From my friend's perspective, Twitter is yet one more intrusion into his personal space, one more means by which people will break into his train of thought to demand his immediate attention, demand immediate action, demand an immediate response without giving him the time to think a problem through. "Isn't this demand for more, faster, immediacy part of the problem with our society?" he asked.

But everyone is Tweeting these days: President Obama, Sarah Palin, John McCain, the Baltimore police department, even the freaking Pentagon. Heck, Hugh Jackman is offering $100,000 to the non-for-profit that Tweets him with the best 140-character pitch. Some guy who just started following me has more than fourteen thousand followers -- and follows that many himself. You have to ask yourself -- what the heck for?


More Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

It's gotten to the point that there's even a business helping people find available Twitter handles.

My friend isn't alone in his assessment -- apparently Twitter's retention rate is a lamentable 40% -- and Nicholas Carr pithily says, "Twitter may turn out to be the CB radio of Web 2.0."

InformationWeek's editor in chief, Rob Preston, notes that businesses seem to be looking for excuses to implement Twitter, rather than finding actual reasons.

Most enterprise users of social apps have jerry-rigged an ROI, mostly around cost savings and productivity improvements, but those justifications are still mostly qualitative. Meantime, skepticism abounds.

But Twitter has a lot going for it, beyond fast communication capabilities. For one thing, it is hardware- and software-agnostic; you can "be" on Twitter on any device, anywhere you can get online. It is simple to use. You can see what people are talking about in a big old hurry. You can also figure out what people are saying about you or your company. TechCrunch founder Michael Arrington tells BusinessWeek,

I realized that in the last two months a subtle shift occurred: I now need Twitter more than Twitter needs me... It is now an important part of my work and social life, as I carry on bite-sized conversations with thousands of people around the world throughout the day. It's a huge marketing tool, and information tool. But it is also a social habit that's hard to kick.
Sometimes you're found guilty by association, and it's tempting to do so with Twitter when Michael Arrington, the ultimate in solipsistic tech journalism, gets in on the act.

So are we all talking to each other in a collective circle-jerk? Perhaps, but if that circle gets big enough, it stops being an echo chamber and starts resembling something like a societal conversation. Finding out what Tweeters are thinking about and telling them about yourself becomes relevant to a larger crowd. It's not fifteen minutes of fame -- it's 140 characters of pithiness (if you can manage).

Let's face it, the telephone used to ring obnoxiously, haranguing us with its loud, persistent clanging bell to pick up the receiver in the middle of the night to bring us news we'd just as soon have learned in the morning from the mail or telegram. You might have wanted to stop it right there in its tracks, but you couldn't, any more than you could stop the railroad from cutting through your town, bringing the world to your doorstep.

There are lots of reasons why Twitter matters and why we Tweet. But in the final analysis, we Tweet because it's there.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links