The InformationWeek -- Blogs
Welcome Guest. | Log In| Register | Membership Benefits

Open Source Blog

Topics:   Open Source

  • Email this page E-mail this page
  • Print this page Print this page
  • Bookmark and Share
  • icon

GPLv2 Ambiguities Linger On


Posted by Serdar Yegulalp, Oct 16, 2009 10:47 AM

Scarcely a week goes by without some criticism or analysis of open source licensing, and this time around it's whether or not the GPLv2's "legally ambiguous".


The whole story comes by way of The Register, gleaned from a larger discussion about licensing hosted by Black Duck Software. The folks in question are Mark Radcliffe and Karen Coenhaver, the former serving as counsel for the Open Source Initiative (the group that most people turn to for word on which open source licenses are valid) and the latter being counsel for the Linux Foundation. They expressed concern that the way the GPLv2 was worded isn't up to speed:

The challenge, according to the two lawyers, is that US copyright framework is not well suited to computer software. A term like "derivative work" may be reasonably easy to understand in the context of a book or a movie, but there are several levels more difficult in terms of software. GPLv2 tosses out this legal terminology in free fashion.

Radcliffe's (and Copenhaver's) criticism is that the GPLv2 mixes and matches the meanings of too many different things -- the meaning of a "derivative work", for instance -- and that the GPLv3 and AGPLv3 are better worded to suit the ambiguities of these situations.

What I found most intriguing was this passage from the article:

"I think the critical thing to recognize in the differentiation between GPLv2, GPLv3, and AGPLv3 is that there was a very strong effort to purposefully distance ourselves from copyright laws," said Radcliffe. Copyright law is "not stable," he says, and it changes over time. Equally important is that copyright law varies from country to country.

I.e., open source (and free) software would not be where they are now without the protections afforded by copyright, but the situation might be different in the future.

I don't think this means they believe copyright is on the way out. It's too deeply entrenched and too genuinely useful to too many people (little guys and big guys alike), and when it changes it typically changes to favor the copyright owners. I do believe parallel developments (like Creative Commons) will become both more respected and useful, but not in a way that makes copyright irrelevant.

From everything I've seen, though, there's little to suggest the GPLv2 isn't a defensible choice in the real world, where everything from the Linux kernel on down uses it. What is happening, though, is growing interest in the galaxy of licensing options apart from the GPLv2 -- both for the reasons cited above, and the fact that each license comes with its own world of software, developers and community contribution attached to it.

When you pick a license for a project, that speaks a great deal about what kind of work you want done with it -- and what you want other people to do with it, and how. The GPLv2 still carries a great deal of weight in that respect and probably will for a long time to come.

InformationWeek Analytics has published an independent analysis on application delivery. Download the report here (registration required).

Follow me and the rest of InformationWeek on Twitter.

« BadCustomer.com Is Bad News For Online Retail | Main | Here Comes Automated Storage Tiering »



Sign Up Now
For InformationWeek News Alerts




This is a public forum. United Business Media and its affiliates are not responsible for and do not control what is posted herein. United Business Media makes no warranties or guarantees concerning any advice dispensed by its staff members or readers.

Community standards in this comment area do not permit hate language, excessive profanity, or other patently offensive language. Please be aware that all information posted to this comment area becomes the property of United Business Media LLC and may be edited and republished in print or electronic format as outlined in United Business Media's Terms of Service.

Important Note: This comment area is NOT intended for commercial messages or solicitations of business.




 
 

  1. Think Parallel 2010, Five Years of Multicore
  2. It's All In the Strategy, It's All About the Design
  3. How To Do Parallelism Without Getting Egg On Your Face


Join The InformationWeek Group On LinkedIn


  1. iPad Orders Surge, Then Plummet Over Weekend
  2. Windows 7 Is Really That Good
  3. Windows Phone 7 Apps Must Be Microsoft Approved


  1. Cloud Connect: U.S. IT In Forefront
  2. Google Brings Nexus One To AT&T, Rogers Wireless
  3. Intel Launches Six Core Server Processors
  4. Open Government Public Deadline Nears
  5. FBI Goes Undercover On Social Networks
  6. DHS May Be Wasting Data Center Spending

 

  Ars Technica
Boing Boing
Channel 9 Forums
CRN Blogs
Dr.Dobb's Portal: Blogs
Engadget
Gizmodo
GrokLaw
  Lifehacker
Schneier on Security
Slashdot
TechCrunch
Techdirt
Techmeme
Valleywag

  DECEMBER 2008
NOVEMBER 2008
OCTOBER 2008
SEPTEMBER 2008
AUGUST 2008
JULY 2008
JUNE 2008
MAY 2008
  APRIL 2008
MARCH 2008
FEBRUARY 2008
JANUARY 2008
DECEMBER 2007
NOVEMBER 2007
OCTOBER 2007
SEPTEMBER 2007