Commentary

Ed Hansberry
 

Linux Based iPad Rival

The iPad hasn't even been out for two weeks yet and there is already a Linux rival to the iconic device. As with all rivals, it seems to have more of everything - a larger screen, webcam and USB ports, the latter two totally missing on the iPad. Like all other things Linux though, will the market care?

The iPad hasn't even been out for two weeks yet and there is already a Linux rival to the iconic device. As with all rivals, it seems to have more of everything - a larger screen, webcam and USB ports, the latter two totally missing on the iPad. Like all other things Linux though, will the market care?Yes, I know Android is Linux based, but Android is Google and they used Linux as the underpinnings, but it is still a product built and marketed by one of the sharpest companies in the world. Other commercial Linux offering haven't fared so well for consumers. Does anyone remember the Yopi? It was started by Samsung, handed off to GMate and then off into oblivion. It was a PDA with some impressive specs that outclassed the Palm Pilot and Pocket PC on paper, but outside of tech circles, was basically unheard of. It never drew many developers and ultimately died.

That is just one example of a Linux project for consumers that went nowhere. Linux powered netbooks are another example. I have to wonder if the WePad, the name for the new tablet competitor to the iPad, will be just another footnote in tablet computing history.


More Mobility Insights

White Papers

More >>

Reports

More >>

Webcasts

More >>

The device is made by German company Neofonie GmbH. Founder Helmut Hoffer von Ankershoffen discussed the price of roughly $600 for the 16GB version, which is $100 more than the 16GB iPad, but with more features. Ankershoffen "claimed that given its technological superiority and greater openness, "that's a bargain compared with the iPad."

He also claimed that it is a benefit that the WePad isn't tied to a music store, allowing people to use music from a variety of sources.

I disagree. iTunes, love it or hate it, is the main reason the iPod was so popular, not the hardware. It finally let people get top notch music easily on their device. Now, coupled with the App Store and Apples' ebook offerings, getting popular content on your device is just a few taps away. One stop shopping beats using a dozen or more sites any day of the week for most people. This is why the Kindle is such a popular ebook reader. It has good hardware and is hooked up to a fantastic online book store.

Microsoft is trying to replicate this story with the Zune library being the hub for their mobile devices. This openness that the WePad offers that sounds so appealing when you say it will be its downfall, as it has been on so many Linux devices. It isn't about the hardware or the software, it is about the entire ecosystem, and when your ecosystem can conceivably include everything, it means nothing. The consumer is left to their own devices to find their content and build their libraries.

The problem is, the consumer will just go buy a device that has a prebuilt ecosystem that is content rich and easy to deal with.


Related Reading




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
T-Shirt Giveaway T-Shirt Giveaway: Each week we're selecting one great comment from our readers. The author of the comment will receive an InformaitonWeek Community t-shirt. So get posting!
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links