Cloud service providers and brokers are making it simpler than ever for government agencies to provision cloud infrastructure and other services. But agencies are paying too little attention to what happens should the time come to switch vendors or reverse course, say people involved in moving federal government agencies into the cloud.
Vendors promise that agencies can decommission their cloud services at any time and take their data elsewhere. But agencies without a well-developed exit strategy are likely to discover that it's much easier -- and cheaper -- to move into a cloud provider than it is to move out, raising the risk of lock-in. "We have a robust approach for getting into clouds, but we have almost no procedures for getting out," says Gunnar Hellekson, chief technology strategist for Red Hat's U.S. public sector business.
Mark Day, acting deputy assistant commissioner at the U.S. General Services Administration's IT acquisition services division, urges federal agencies to address the following questions: What does the transition look like when we come out of a cloud provider? What transition clauses do we need? And what standards do we want? "There are no best practices for that yet," Day adds.
Hellekson's concerns go beyond the need for an exit strategy. "The ability to switch providers creates a certain degree of pricing arbitrage," he says. "This is one of the primary selling points of the cloud." But if agencies have a hard time leaving a provider because of the costs of unraveling and reintegrating systems, "then you can't perform that arbitrage," Hellekson says.
Exacerbating cloud lock-in, and thus weakening agencies' negotiating leverage, is their tendency to customize their cloud services, says former Department of Homeland Security CIO Richard A. Spires, who recommends that agencies avoid those specialized features and support as much as possible.
Hellekson says agencies need to build a detailed strategy for winding down their cloud vendor commitments. Usually when an agency moves from one IT vendor to another, the new vendor pays for the data migration. He recommends instead putting the responsibility on the first vendor. Before signing on the dotted line with a cloud vendor, agencies should explicitly detail in the contract the terms for how that vendor is responsible for packing up and moving the customer's data in the event the customer wants to change vendors.
"If you're renting a house, it's built into the contract that you'll leave it in clean condition or there are consequences -- it's not the next tenant's job to do," Hellekson says. While that relationship is the inverse of the roles he suggests data tenants and their data landlords play, the principle is the same, he says.
"The government knows how to acquire services," Hellekson says. "While there aren't any fundamental acquisition reforms that have to happen, acquisition [teams] should provide more levers to facilitate an exit from a cloud service provider."
2014 Next-Gen WAN SurveyWhile 68% say demand for WAN bandwidth will increase, just 15% are in the process of bringing new services or more capacity online now. For 26%, cost is the problem. Enter vendors from Aryaka to Cisco to Pertino, all looking to use cloud to transform how IT delivers wide-area connectivity.
Server Market SplitsvilleJust because the server market's in the doldrums doesn't mean innovation has ceased. Far from it -- server technology is enjoying the biggest renaissance since the dawn of x86 systems. But the primary driver is now service providers, not enterprises.
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?