Cloud // Cloud Storage
Commentary
5/18/2009
02:15 PM
Serdar Yegulalp
Serdar Yegulalp
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Ubuntu One: Canonical's Cloud

Canonical calls it "Ubuntu One". The goal is, according to Stefano Forenza, to build a full-blown online platform -- Canonical's version of Windows Live, or MobileMe / .Mac / iTools. But can they do it without having their intended userbase siphoned away?

Canonical calls it "Ubuntu One". The goal is, according to Stefano Forenza, to build a full-blown online platform -- Canonical's version of Windows Live, or MobileMe / .Mac / iTools. But can they do it without having their intended userbase siphoned away?

A detailed discussion of it is scheduled at OSCON, and the blurb there is quite telling:

Ubuntu One provides shared synchronised storage and databases for developers: you store your data and Ubuntu One takes care of making it available to every other person and every other machine you've shared it to. In addition to this set of simple APIs which you can use to get synchronised data, Ubuntu One also offers services built on top of these: work with your users' contacts to make it easy to share information with other people, and build services on top of all these APIs which work everywhere, both from the web and from the desktop.

This to me is a broad hint as to how Canonical plans to monetize Ubuntu: not just by selling support for it, but selling services -- end-user services that people actually use and want to pay for because they already do. If people are going to take their computing to go, and you want them to use your platform for same, best to give them both the local and remote ends of the deal. Give them both something to plug into, and something to plug in with.

Good idea. Here's what's worth worrying about, though: The development of the project is entirely internal, although the client software is GPLv3- / CC-licensed. So if the APIs and client software are all open, who's to say that they won't be ported to other platforms, thereby defeating the whole purpose?

Historically, that's what's happened with anything free/open. Random example: far more people run OpenOffice on Windows than they do on Linux (in fact, it's developed on Windows to begin with). Unless Canonical is willing to admit that they may ultimately be building a platform that is OS-agnostic, and are willing to live gracefully with that, it won't be worth the trouble.


InformationWeek has published an in-depth report on cloud storage. Download the report here (registration required).


Follow me and the rest of InformationWeek on Twitter.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Google in the Enterprise Survey
Google in the Enterprise Survey
There's no doubt Google has made headway into businesses: Just 28 percent discourage or ban use of its productivity ­products, and 69 percent cite Google Apps' good or excellent ­mobility. But progress could still stall: 59 percent of nonusers ­distrust the security of Google's cloud. Its data privacy is an open question, and 37 percent worry about integration.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Government Tech Digest Oct. 27, 2014
To meet obligations -- and avoid accusations of cover-up and incompetence -- federal agencies must get serious about digitizing records.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
A roundup of the top stories and community news at InformationWeek.com.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.