Healthcare // Clinical Information Systems
News
11/15/2013
09:05 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Telemedicine Transforms Rural Care

Telemedicine is a useful tool for anyone, but it's vital in a rural setting.

Telehealth is increasingly an option for patients looking for fast and affordable care -- from mobile apps that diagnose skin conditions to medical kiosks stationed at malls, the opportunities for remote treatment are growing. But when a hospital is located four hours away from the closest airport, telemedicine is less of an option and more of a requirement.

Rural hospitals face a unique set of challenges when delivering quality care, and access to specialists is just one of them. Only about 10 percent of US physicians practice in rural areas, with almost a quarter of the country's population living in these areas, according to a 2010 report issued by the Office of Rural Health Policy. The same report found the number of specialists per 100,000 people is 40 in rural areas, compared to 134 in urban areas.

Telemedicine, or the remote diagnosis and treatment of patients via telecommunications technology, has become an indispensable tool for rural hospitals to improve patient care and their bottom line. Telemedicine, just like every aspect of healthcare technology, is a business, and the financial benefits can't be ignored.

"The communications and device infrastructure has drastically improved compared to years ago," said Siemens Healthcare CEO John Glaser. "We're at a time where the technology has matured in some very significant ways that enable us to do things that five years ago were cost prohibitive or ungainly."

When rural patients know their hospital is using telemedicine, they have higher regard for that hospital and are less likely to bypass it for treatment at an urban facility, said James Marcin, director of the UC Davis Children's Hospital Pediatric Telemedicine Program. Marcin recently authored a study that found telemedicine consults significantly improved outcomes for patients treated in rural pediatric emergency departments. The study also found that a physician was more likely to adjust the patient's diagnosis and course of treatment after a face-to-face video conference with a specialist.

Improved patient outcomes are always ideal, but the financial pressures hospitals experience in today’s changing reimbursement landscape are also driving the push for telemedicine. Under the Affordable Care Act, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services is reducing reimbursements to hospitals with excess readmissions. As the UC Davis study shows, telemedicine consultations from a rural hospital to a larger medical center can result in a more accurate diagnosis and better treatment on the initial hospital visit, reducing the chances of readmission.

Telemedicine not only saves money, but also drives revenue. Specialists order tests, labs, and prescriptions. With telemedicine, those dollars stay at the rural site, where the tests are performed. Because of this, telemedicine tends to be used more often in emergent cases that require tests and labs, and isn’t used as much in areas like psychiatric care because the payout isn’t as big.

"The sad thing is, just like everything when you're in a capitalistic environment, the alcoholic drug addict with Hepatitis C is not big business for telemedicine," Marcin said. "If they don't have good insurance, it's not going to work."

Even when telemedicine does work, it can be a challenge to get a program off the ground.

Southern Inyo Healthcare District Hospital, a 37-bed facility in Lone Pine, Calif., is located about four hours from the nearest airport. Southern Inyo pioneered its telemedicine program in the late '90s. It now has two mobile telemedicine carts equipped with video conferencing technology that can go anywhere in the hospital and clinic.

"It was a challenge for providers to accept that model of care change," said Lee Barron, Southern Inyo's CEO and CFO. "Primary care physicians were resistant because they were used to referring a patient to a specialist and moving on from that patient."

Successful implementation is possible, but leadership on the rural side needs to be strong, Marcin said.

"Nobody likes change," he said. "It's very important on the remote end to have a local, rural, clinical champion. You need somebody that's interested in investing the time and energy in changing the culture."

To introduce the doctors to the new technology, hospitals participating in UC Davis's study received periodic test calls outside of necessary consultations.

"You don't want the technology to fail when you really need it," Marcin said. "It's important to have it implemented and easy to use. There also has to be value connected to it. The doctor has to recognize what they'll gain from this technology.

With telemedicine, the PCP continues to be part of the patient's care even if a specialist is involved, because they are facilitating the virtual consultations and helping the patient make decisions. This ongoing participation has proved to be educational for the rural doctors, Barron said.

As the PCP becomes involved with the treatment of the more complex cases that telemedicine is intended for, they learn and are eventually able to handle those types of cases on their own. This has changed the types of cases Southern Inyo refers. 

"The referrals we have now are real referrals," Barron said. "Several years back, the referrals weren't totally necessary. Sometimes the specialists were spinning their wheels because they thought the primary doc could take care of it. Now the referrals are legitimate."

Those referrals mean more business for urban hospitals. Telemedicine creates partnerships between rural and urban facilities. While telemedicine decreases the number of patients transferred to urban facilities, those who are transferred are transferred almost exclusively to one hospital because of that partnership, Marcin said.

There are rules to these partnerships, however. Because of anti-kickback laws, urban hospitals are prohibited from purchasing telemedicine equipment for rural hospitals because it could create an incentive to use a specific hospital. An exception to this rule is if the equipment is purchased for research. Many hospitals, like Southern Inyo, fund telemedicine technology with grants. A standard telemedicine cart equipped with a quality monitor and camera can cost around $20,000.

"There's a huge range of the cost and quality of telemedicine technology," Marcin said. "With time, things get better and cheaper."

As telemedicine becomes more affordable and prevalent, will it replace the need for rural docs?

It's not likely, Marcin said.

"The rural hospital plays a critical role in routine care," he said. "That's not what telemedicine's focus is. The routine stuff is dealt with appropriately and well by rural and community hospitals. There's no fear of us or them becoming obsolete."

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
11/15/2013 | 9:55:02 AM
How widespread?
How widespread is the use of telemedicine services in the rural setting? I'm wondering how many facilities lack the appropriate equipment and bandwith.
RobPreston
50%
50%
RobPreston,
User Rank: Author
11/15/2013 | 10:59:57 AM
Re: How widespread?
Perhaps we'll see telecare hubs spring up, places that are fully wired/equipped and are within a short drive where patients (for a reasonable fee) can have their remote visits with far-flung doctors.
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
11/15/2013 | 11:59:36 AM
Re: How widespread?
Good idea. Maybe you should quit your day job and hustle together a business plan.
Tom Murphy
50%
50%
Tom Murphy,
User Rank: Author
11/15/2013 | 6:04:34 PM
Re: How widespread?
Everytime I read a piece about the life-saving capabilities of telemedicine, I think back to the late '90s when I interviewed Dave Dorman, then CEO of then Pacific Bell, talking about how within a few years, the Information Superhighway would provide every rural resident the same care they could get from the finest doctor at the finest urban hospital.

Didn't happen, did it? The problem isn't the technology.  It's been available for over a decade. The problem is people -- doctors, hospitals, and insurance companies can't get out of their very comfortable and lucrative models.  

Local hospitals, clinics, and doctors just aren't about to give up the local business -- not on your life.

 

 
Alex Kane Rudansky
50%
50%
Alex Kane Rudansky,
User Rank: Author
11/16/2013 | 12:30:31 PM
Re: How widespread?
The federal Office for the Advancement of Telehealth (OAT) reports that more than 200 telemedicine networks are now operating, and that the number of U.S. telemedicine service sites recently topped 3,500.
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
11/18/2013 | 11:10:01 AM
Re: How widespread?
Note that this is 1 of 2 articles by Alex Kane Rudansky on rural healthcare - see also EHR Adoption A Struggle For Rural Hospitals
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014
Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of November 16, 2014.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.