Healthcare // Electronic Health Records
Commentary
8/6/2013
03:32 PM
Paul Cerrato
Paul Cerrato
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%
Repost This

EHR Roulette: Gambling On Medicine's Future

As medical practices look to replace clunky ambulatory electronic health records systems, picking a winner can seem like risky business.

9 Mobile EHRs Compete For Doctors' Attention
9 Mobile EHRs Compete For Doctors' Attention
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)

Many medical groups are not happy with the EHR systems they initially invested in and are looking for a better option. One survey by consultancy Software Advice, for instance, found that the number of medical groups purchasing new electronic health records to replace existing EHRs grew from 21% in 2010 to 31% in 2013. The vast majority switched because they were dissatisfied; in 2010, almost 59% were changing vendors for that reason, but that figure jumped to 74.2% in 2013.

That kind of bleak data tracks with findings from KLAS and Black Book surveys, whose customer satisfaction surveys can make vendors cringe. Such data can make the process of choosing a replacement EHR system feel like a hit-or-miss gamble. Listening to the divergent views of physicians who have put EHR systems into practice only confirms the feeling.

"We all see fewer patients since implementing EHRs two years ago and take more time to do it," said Dr. Dave Denton, a pediatrician in Idaho.

"We're excited about employing patient self-check kiosks ... Being able to implement [EHR] technology gives us a competitive advantage," said Dr. John Bender, a family physician from Colorado.

"My office manager quit because the [EHR] was so difficult," said Dr. Robert Joseph, an anesthesiologist from Florida.

"Though people complain about electronic records, no one wants to go back to paper," said Dr. Michael Lee, director of informatics at Atrius Health.

[ More lousy reviews for EHRs? See Hospitals Struggle With EHRs For Quality Reporting, AHA Says. ]

Given these hot-and-cold reviews, what's the key to success? There's lots of good advice and helpful resources to turn to when making the decision. Surveys from the likes of KLAS and Black Book are one place to start.

Both KLAS and Black Book gave high marks to Athenahealth. When asked, "How successful have you been in getting your system to a high overall level of usability?" respondents to KLAS's "Ambulatory EMR Usability 2013" surveygave the vendor an 85% rating. Similarly, in Black Book's soon-to-be-released survey, Athenahealth was one of three ambulatory EHR systems that rose to the top of its usability satisfaction scale, along with Cerner and Greenway. But on a more negative note, the KLAS survey found that only 55% of McKesson users reported success in achieving high usability. And more than half of clients using McKesson's Practice Partner program were "unhappy with go-live usability."

Asked about the KLAS survey, a spokesperson for McKesson said it is "committed to improving the customer experience with McKesson Practice Partner and has made a number of financial and staffing investments in the software over the last 12 months," and it expects customer satisfaction to improve as a result.

On a more positive note, the KLAS survey discovered that vendors are more inclined than they once were to hold buyers' hands along the road to usability. Epic got relatively high marks in that regard, as did Athenahealth. But it's interesting to note that sometimes physicians are their own worst enemy in using software to improve operations. One KLAS client said, "Athenahealth has an approach that they think is most efficient and best, and it may be, but getting doctors to agree on things is like herding cats."

Is Meaningful Use Getting In The Way?

A growing concern is that the most powerful driving force behind EHR implementation nationwide -- the federal government's Meaningful Use (MU) program -- may now be slowing down the push for better usability. According to the American Medical Association, the MU "certification process must be retooled in order to address a variety of problems many physicians are experiencing with their use of certified EHRs." The AMA letter complained that many systems require several tedious steps to perform simple functions, and the need for usability is not something factored into the review and certification process.

One way to fix the problem, says AMA, is to "stop adding measures to the Meaningful Use program and allow vendors to work on usability concerns." As any provider who has tried to meet MU stage 2 criteria knows, there's a long list of performance measures that must be met to qualify.

Make no mistake about it, choosing an EHR system can be risky business, and if it's an EHR replacement it only increases the stakes. High upfront costs, ongoing maintenance fees, lack of vendor support, disruptions in workflow and clunky interfaces are all possibilities that make choosing a vendor a high-stakes decision. It's time that the feds slowed down on MU requirements and let vendors concentrate more on creating better interfaces, writing better code and spending more time fixing glitches. That would at least improve the odds a bit in favor of the EHR implementers.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Alex Kane Rudansky
50%
50%
Alex Kane Rudansky,
User Rank: Author
8/7/2013 | 4:52:47 PM
re: EHR Roulette: Gambling On Medicine's Future
Lack of vendor support is a particularly pressing issue for rural hospitals. EHR vendors don't make much money off of those hospitals because of the lack of volume and are less inclined to follow up with implementation and adoption support.
Healthcare IT Systems
50%
50%
Healthcare IT Systems,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/8/2013 | 9:25:28 PM
re: EHR Roulette: Gambling On Medicine's Future
There was a huge initial push from healthcare organizations to implement EHRs in order to qualify for financial incentives. As a result some due diligence may have been avoided. Training may also be a factor with some of the usability complaints not to mentioned the post implementation support mentioned by Alex
LisaDreher
50%
50%
LisaDreher,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/13/2013 | 6:27:38 PM
re: EHR Roulette: Gambling On Medicine's Future
No question, EHR adoption can be a messy process. We work with many healthcare providers to streamline their EHR systems--see it at http://www.us.logicalis.com/mi...
jaysimmons
50%
50%
jaysimmons,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/13/2013 | 9:06:20 PM
re: EHR Roulette: Gambling On Medicine's Future
I completely agree, many organizations pushed for quick EHR implementations in order to attest for MU and therefore get the financial incentives promised, while ignoring other factors such as the usability of the EHR systems. Implementing an EHR system successfully requires a lot of back end work such as coming up with workflows and providing sufficient training to the physicians and front end users. I notice that the lack of training is a huge factor in whether an EHR fails or succeeds, no matter how user friendly the system is.

Jay Simmons
Information Week Contributor
David F. Carr
50%
50%
David F. Carr,
User Rank: Author
8/28/2013 | 2:02:18 PM
re: EHR Roulette: Gambling On Medicine's Future
Is there a common theme about what vendors get wrong in the usability of these applications? Is it a matter of packing too much info onto one screen?
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Elite 100 - 2014
Our InformationWeek Elite 100 issue -- our 26th ranking of technology innovators -- shines a spotlight on businesses that are succeeding because of their digital strategies. We take a close at look at the top five companies in this year's ranking and the eight winners of our Business Innovation awards, and offer 20 great ideas that you can use in your company. We also provide a ranked list of our Elite 100 innovators.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Audio Interviews
Archived Audio Interviews
GE is a leader in combining connected devices and advanced analytics in pursuit of practical goals like less downtime, lower operating costs, and higher throughput. At GIO Power & Water, CIO Jim Fowler is part of the team exploring how to apply these techniques to some of the world's essential infrastructure, from power plants to water treatment systems. Join us, and bring your questions, as we talk about what's ahead.