Healthcare // Analytics
News
10/7/2010
02:02 PM
50%
50%

Health IT Industry Calls For Data Transport Standards

Delaying publication of the required methods for moving electronic health record information will increase costs, add confusion, says Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society.




Image Gallery: African Hospital Digitizes Medical Records
(click for larger image and for full photo gallery)
As hospitals and eligible professionals prepare their electronic health record (EHR) systems to meet meaningful use criteria, an executive from the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) is urging the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) to quickly publish accepted data transport standards to eliminate confusion, while efficiently and cost effectively advancing health IT adoption.

Joyce Sensmeier, HIMSS VP for informatics, told the congressional subcommittee on technology and innovation last week that data transport and basic security are focus areas where selected standards are missing. However, these standards are crucial as healthcare organizations prepare to exchange data between departments within a hospital and between hospital computers and systems residing at local, state, and federal organizations.

"We understand that Stage 1 is not intended to force interoperability on a healthcare community that is not technically ready to meet the requirement. However, identifying the accepted transportation method will have a dramatic impact on preparedness for Stage 2," Sensmeier said. "For example, it is important to designate standards for documenting the content of clinical summaries, but if we don't know how to transmit these summaries or acknowledge their receipt, we will have limited interoperability."

In her testimony to the committee, Sensmeier said that until the recommended transport standards are identified, EHR vendors will be forced to support all available transport methods, or risk developing software that may not meet future interoperability needs. She said the lack of guidance creates marketplace confusion, wastes existing resources, and could ultimately delay the progress of implementing EHR systems.

Under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, the Medicare and Medicaid EHR incentive programs was established to provide incentive payments for the "meaningful use" of certified EHR technology. The program provides incentive payments to eligible professionals and hospitals as they adopt, implement, upgrade, or demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology.

Sensmeier explains standards quandary
Speaking with InformationWeek after her testimony, Sensmeier said she spoke to several health IT vendors who are worried that the appropriate interoperability standards have not been selected, and that this could hamper the progress of EHR adoption.

According to Sensmeier, if vendors don't know what the selected standards are going to be, then they will guess what they might be and build those into their product development. Furthermore, there are currently two clinical summary content standards -- CCR and CCD -- and this creates further difficulties.

"When two standards are selected, vendors and providers have to choose to support one standard, or instead, support both, which is very costly, resource intensive, and minimizes interoperability capabilities across organizations. It is our recommendation that only one standard is selected for each criterion in future stages of meaningful use," Sensmeier told the committee.

Referring to Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE), which is a global initiative that drives the adoption of health IT standards for clinical needs as well as work done by the Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP) and other standards harmonization bodies, Sensmeier said there is already a body of work that has developed standards that can be incorporated by ONC as it guides the implementation of EHRs.

Sensmeier is also urging ONC to publish the selected standards for interoperability 18 months before Stage 2 of meaningful use commences. That, she said, will ensure optimal software development, testing, and safe implementation by providers.

Sensmeier told InformationWeek that, while the time to implement and publish selected standards for interoperability is short, there are standards available, and there's no need to reinvent the wheel.

"ONC needs to start working towards selecting transport standards which will take us further down the road to interoperability and they need to let us know in a timely way so that vendors can get it into their products earlier rather than having to rework them later," Sensmeier said.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Big Love for Big Data? The Remedy for Healthcare Quality Improvements
Big Love for Big Data? The Remedy for Healthcare Quality Improvements
Healthcare data is nothing new, but yet, why do healthcare improvements from quantifiable data seem almost rare today? Healthcare administrators have a wealth of data accessible to them but aren't sure how much of that data is usable or even correct.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Dec. 9, 2014
Apps will make or break the tablet as a work device, but don't shortchange critical factors related to hardware, security, peripherals, and integration.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on InformationWeek.com for the week of December 14, 2014. Be here for the show and for the incredible Friday Afternoon Conversation that runs beside the program.
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.