Nobody will win if IT and business leaders continue playing Mortal Kombat. Let's step back and redefine our roles.
A recent Harvard Business Review blog post by management professor Terri Griffith finally asks the question: "Are we asking too much of our CIOs?" It is a great question. IT organizations have taken on more and more (and more) as technology pervades every aspect of business and consumer life. Something's gotta give.
From provisioning, operating and securing the sprawling Internet of Things to driving revenue and leading innovation in general, IT is now accountable for the success of virtually the entire business. Almost every important business process innovation of the last two decades has relied on technology: from CRM, ERP and supply chain management in the last two decades to social media, big data, consumerization and software-as-a-service in this one.
As the old maxim goes: Never give accountability without authority. But somewhere in the era of Ethernet and TCP/IP, not only did IT in general start to become mission critical for more and more people, but like a nightmare project, the scope of IT started to creep without commensurate change orders. For example, first IT managers were responsible for building on-premises security systems for their networks, then camera systems, elevators, phones and even fuel pumps became de facto "information technology" objects. Those "things" landed in IT's lap when the folks who installed them went on to spread sunshine elsewhere.
All of this activity was good, because it avoided building out redundant infrastructure and saved companies boatloads of cash. Trouble was and is, much of this work, even some phone projects, happened without IT's direction, leading to problems that could have been avoided with proper planning. IT organizations started to get used to a pattern of sneak attacks of responsibility without resourcing. It became the new normal.
And so began the pre-pubescent age of digital business. Here's just a couple of many recent examples of digital business accountability without authority.
Retailers and other companies wanted to give customers the curb appeal amenity of Wi-Fi, but they didn't stop to consider that unfettered network access, using the company's public IP addresses, is a one-way ticket to Spamhaus, if not a nasty email from the RIAA or even a visit from the FBI.
Or consider the company that thinks its IT organization is too slow, so other departments step in by buying software-as-a-service with their credit cards. Their dream turns into a nightmare when their unit becomes hostage to a single provider, that provider gets acquired, its product gets replaced by the new owner's inferior one, and there's no way to migrate to a better competitor's product.
How to fix this mess? Get rid of the middleman! Put the CIO in charge of the company!
OK, I'm kidding. Mostly. Where there's a fight, there's a problem to be solved. We all know that IT pros tend to be too techie and not enough business savvy, but other executives must start carrying their share of the water.
It's fair enough to exhort IT folks to "learn and speak the language of business." But business execs must learn more about technology, learn to "speak the language of digital." Take a class or attend a seminar or two. Get up to speed on the risks of SaaS, the challenges of big data, the true opportunities and downsides with mobile.
Do the math: IT budgets account for 1% or 2%, maybe as high as 5%, of a company's total spending. The people tied to that small percentage can't possibly initiate, manage and lead every single tech-based initiative at a company.
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?