Government // Enterprise Architecture
04:16 PM
Art Wittmann
Art Wittmann
Connect Directly
DDoS Attacks & Their Threats to Your Business
May 10, 2016
Who better to brief you on the latest in DDoS attacks and prevention than the ones working on the ...Read More>>

Does Microsoft Know Best?

Microsoft, RIM and HP are among the vendors increasingly taking a "works best with our stuff" approach for new products. Consider what that means for your IT strategy.

Microsoft and other vendors are increasingly taking a "works best with our stuff" approach for their new products. It's time to reexamine what that means for your IT strategy.

As the forces of mobility, software as a service, and big data reset everything about enterprise IT, many industry behemoths find that the value proposition of their core products is being shaken (sort of like shaking an Etch-A-Sketch). For instance, Windows on desktops and laptops has been worth countless billions of dollars to Microsoft as it has offered applications and other products that rely on the Windows underpinning. But in a world where most end user computing will happen on handhelds, where there's virtually no Windows presence, it's no longer clear just how much of a fundamental advantage Windows is--or if it's one at all.

History is replete with examples of very large companies that had good products but saw them marginalized by a tie to some core product that lost its mojo. Novell's NDS/eDirectory suffered from a reliance on NetWare. When NetWare tanked, so for the most part did NDS, despite the fact that it had a good head start as an enterprise directory system.

[ There are other issues vendors need to deal with also. Read Cloud Plans: Open Letter To Enterprise Application Vendors. ]

More recently, there's RIM's BlackBerry Mobile Fusion, a mobile device manager (MDM) that has some promising features but takes a "better with BlackBerry" approach. BlackBerry Mobile Fusion's not exactly what IT pros are looking for--an MDM system that manages best the devices that users now want least. You can certainly see why RIM would arrive at that approach, but it's likely to please only the most dedicated BlackBerry shops, and that's a shame.

Microsoft is extending its "first and best with Windows" approach beyond its on-premises applications to those that run in the cloud. One can only imagine the arguments in Redmond about that strategy. On one side, you have the managers of those cloud-based apps, who must worry that Windows on handhelds will never gain the market share of iOS and Android. On the other side, you have the folks who believe that if Microsoft keeps up the good fight and brings the best apps in the best way to all versions of Windows first, the company will trounce yet more competitors just as it has numerous others.

Global CIO
Global CIOs: A Site Just For You
Visit InformationWeek's Global CIO -- our online community and information resource for CIOs operating in the global economy.

HP is creating its own "better with HP" approach as it acquires software assets to augment its enterprise hardware products. When HP bought ArcSight, Fortify, and TippingPoint, it also set out to build other products that manage projects and help IT execs monitor the health of their systems. The catch with these systems is that they can take a lot of work to set up and run, but of course that work is lessened if you're using all HP products. HP never puts "better with HP" as the headline, but it will usually mention it when the issue of product TCO comes up. What's less clear is whether HP has changed the development priorities for the market-leading products it acquired.

Vendors provide a lot of excuses for why they support their own products first and competitors' later. It isn't a way to rope customers into buying more of their products, they say, but the natural result of their constrained resources and need to set priorities. And yet the hallmark of an enterprise security management product like ArcSight is that it works with everything. It's an odd artifact that smaller companies manage to offer broader support--say, for end user systems--than large companies with vested interests. And yet smaller companies must. If Microsoft didn't have a vested interest in Windows, don't you think it would support every major end user system in common use?

For buyers, it comes down to best of breed versus that painfully easy choice to go with the vendor you've gone to in the past. But then there's that Etch-A-Sketch-like reset that begs you not to take the easy path.

See the future of business technology at Interop Las Vegas, May 6-10. It's the best place to learn how cloud computing, mobile, video, virtualization, and other key technologies work together to drive business. Register today with priority code CPQCNL07 to get a free Expo Pass or to save 25% on Flex and Conference passes..

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
User Rank: Apprentice
3/27/2012 | 11:53:22 PM
re: Does Microsoft Know Best?
You could add Oracle and Cisco to your list.
Andrew Hornback
Andrew Hornback,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/28/2012 | 12:21:08 AM
re: Does Microsoft Know Best?
And you could add Dell with their KACE product - while it'll work well with desktop/laptop/server hardware from any manufacturer, you get a few more bells and whistles when using it in conjunction with Dell hardware.

I think a lot of this has to do with the mindset that generated the saying "Nobody ever got fired for recommending IBM" - having an infrastructure loaded with components from one manufacturer so that the management of that infrastructure is easier is a safe play. The lower the amount of time spent on administering the environment, the lower the headcount in the IT department can be and still get the job done.

Same goes for security solutions - a number of organizations that I'm familiar with use one vendor's products to protect every possible attack vector - anti-virus, anti-malware, client firewall, anti-spam, etc. While this may make administration easier (one console to run everything), you also end up with more vulnerabilities when that one vendor's products are compromised.

Andrew Hornback
InformationWeek Contributor
User Rank: Apprentice
3/28/2012 | 12:24:27 AM
re: Does Microsoft Know Best?
I think the "nobody ever got fired for buying IBM" saying has more to do with IBM making high-end, ultra-stable and secure systems. Their competitors back in the day, DEC and Wang, also sold integrated systems.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
2016 InformationWeek Elite 100
Our 28th annual ranking of the leading US users of business technology.
Twitter Feed
InformationWeek Radio
Archived InformationWeek Radio
Join us for a roundup of the top stories on for the week of April 24, 2016. We'll be talking with the editors and correspondents who brought you the top stories of the week!
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.