Our presidential candidates act like they're campaigning in 1912, not 2012. Did Ross Perot ruin charts forever?
I figured it out. I figured out how in one small step the candidates could make the 2016 presidential campaign more informative and effective: Use PowerPoint.
I mean it. If you were making a bet-your-career business pitch, wouldn't you work up a few killer PowerPoint slides, at a minimum?
I'd guess pretty close to 100% of you would, if not a more elaborate, data-intensive multimedia presentation. But Mitt Romney and Barack Obama didn't have enough cash to whip up a deck of slides? In the business world, I hear executives constantly telling me they're trying to make more data-driven decisions. CIOs are creating dashboards that help employees visualize data so they know what action they should take. So why is it that Mitt Romney and Barack Obama almost never push charts on us to try to sway our votes?
The economic issues at the heart of this election are custom-made for data slapped up on a PowerPoint presentation. Governor Romney wants to show the economy is worse off than it was four years ago and is trending in the wrong direction. President Obama wants to show that the country was saved from ruin and is on the upward swing of a recovery. Show us.
And the deficit and debt? Never has an issue been more custom-made for a chart-aided discussion. The numbers are so astronomical they're hard for us to get our heads around, so help us picture the problem and what our government will look like when you're done.
The worst in me suspects two big reasons. One is that the campaigns think we're too stupid. Data and charts will confuse voters and won't have a meaningful impact on our decisions. I get that the campaigns focus on emotions as much as policies, feelings as much as performance. But in a razor-tight election, isn't there a niche here? The independents, the Latino vote, suburban women -- and the data-driven voter!
The second reason I fear is that numbers and charts are too concrete. Once you put numbers to page, they can be used against you. Numbers are harder to "walk back" when it turns out they don't play well in the polls. "Let me show you the chart put up by my opponent … "
Or maybe I'm too cynical, and the dearth of PowerPoint slides and charts is nothing more than a decades-long Ross Perot hangover. Remember the charts he brought to his campaign -- and the Saturday Night Live spoofs they launched?
I'm no political pundit. I'm just a voter in a swing state (Wisconsin) who has watched the debates, convention speeches, and so many rival-bashing campaign ads that I think I can recite some word for word. So next year we voters should insist, like a 6th grade teacher making a public speaking assignment, that each candidate show at least three charts to support his or her argument.
Or perhaps I should just hope for this: Whoever gets into office will try a chart or two as he explains to us what he’s going to do about all of these problems we've been hearing about.
Download the new issue of Must Reads, a compendium of our best recent coverage on IT-as-a-service. It includes articles on cloud computing myths, how to build an IT service catalog, security problems, and more. (Free registration required.)
The Business of Going DigitalDigital business isn't about changing code; it's about changing what legacy sales, distribution, customer service, and product groups do in the new digital age. It's about bringing big data analytics, mobile, social, marketing automation, cloud computing, and the app economy together to launch new products and services. We're seeing new titles in this digital revolution, new responsibilities, new business models, and major shifts in technology spending.
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?