Osmo sells physical game pieces directly to consumers, bypassing Apple's efforts to grab a slice of the revenue.
8 Gadgets For The High-Tech Home
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)
At a time when indie game developers lament the improbability of being able to produce a profitable video game, a startup called Tangible Play may have found an answer.
The company, co-founded by Pramod Sharma, a veteran of Google, and Jérôme Scholler, formerly with LucasArts, has launched its own crowdfunding campaign to produce an iPad game system called Osmo that requires physical components.
Good luck getting anyone to buy your mobile game among the million-plus free apps that are your competition. Gartner in January predicted that by 2018, "less than 0.01% of consumer mobile apps will be considered a financial success by their developers." But people will pay for physical goods, particularly when the product encourages kids to look beyond the mobile devices to interact with the real world.
Osmo consists of three components: a mirror that snaps over an iPad's front-facing camera and directs its view down to the surface supporting the tablet, a stand to keep the iPad upright, and two sets of game pieces -- alphabet tiles and shapes. When it ships later this year, it will support three apps -- Newton, Words, and Tangram -- that will be available as free downloads from Apple's App Store.
These apps are designed around interaction between physical game pieces and the virtual game environment. Move a block and it moves on the screen. Spell a word with tiles, and Osmo will see it.
The genius of Tangible Play's approach is that it keeps Apple's fingers out of its potential revenue. Apple asks companies interested in creating certain hardware components that connect to iOS devices to do so through its MiFi hardware licensing program. Companies that comply must pay a confidential royalty to Apple and must abide by a non-disclosure agreement.
Companies that wish to create iOS peripherals without paying Apple have a few options. They can make certain audio products that connect through the headphone jack. Apple does not attempt to control the analog audio stream to or from iOS devices. They can also make Bluetooth hardware. Apple stopped seeking MiFi certification for Bluetooth peripherals back in 2011.
Osmo's interface is optical -- a mirror to redirect the iPad camera -- and it too is outside of Apple's gatekeeping.
Osmo is available for a pre-order price of $49 during the company's crowdfunding campaign and for $99 thereafter. It's supposed to ship this summer. When it does, Apple won't see a dime. But Tangible Play, unlike the majority of struggling mobile developers, will have already taken many orders at a price point that's orders of magnitude above the 99 cents that fewer and fewer app buyers will pay. That's what permissionless innovation looks like.
Could the growing movement toward open source hardware rewrite the rules for computer and networking hardware the way Linux, Apache, and Android have for software? Also in the Open Source Hardware issue of InformationWeek: Mark Hurd explains his "once-in-a-career opportunity" at Oracle.
Thomas Claburn has been writing about business and technology since 1996, for publications such as New Architect, PC Computing, InformationWeek, Salon, Wired, and Ziff Davis Smart Business. Before that, he worked in film and television, having earned a not particularly useful ... View Full Bio
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
Building a Mobile Business MindsetAmong 688 respondents to our Mobile Application Development Survey ó up from 350 respondents in 2012 ó 46% have deployed mobile apps, with an additional 24% planning to in the next year. Whatís the holdup for that remaining 30%? Often, itís a lack of expertise.
InformationWeek Tech Digest, Nov. 10, 2014Just 30% of respondents to our new survey say their companies are very or extremely effective at identifying critical data and analyzing it to make decisions, down from 42% in 2013. What gives?