At the close of trading Monday, VMware will hold its fourth quarter 2012 earnings call. Revenues are expected to come in on the high side of its range.
7 Cheap Cloud Storage Options
(click image for larger view and for slideshow)
Microsoft is rapidly improving its Hyper-V and Virtual Machine Manager. VMware's respected CTO Steve Herrod has just resigned. Nevertheless, when VMware reports its fourth quarter results after the close of trading today, Wall Street analysts expect it to come in on the high end of its projected revenue range.
Opinion is divided, however, over whether that means VMware has a bright future of continued revenue growth, or whether stepped-up competition from Microsoft and an increasingly saturated market for virtualization in the data center will mean a leveling off of revenues. Any slowing of revenues would affect VMware's heavy investment in R&D, which has keep profit margins lower than they might have been.
Rajest Ghai, analyst at Craig-Hallum Capital Group, an institutional investment banking firm, said Jan. 17 that VMware stock owners should "hold" their shares rather than buying more, and gave the stock a $94 target price in 2013. He saw a "significant potential slowdown in fiscal 2013 license revenue sales" due to increased competition from Microsoft and open-source OpenStack. Shares were trading at $95.57 and moving as he made his recommendation. They were trading at $98.47, in advance of the announcement.
Commenters on his analysis at Barron's Online Jan. 17 noted that Ghai had referred to OpenStack cloud software as "OpenStacks" and suggested that might indicate he didn't know what he was talking about. But Ghai made his comments the day after Microsoft announced improvements to its Hyper-V and System Center with Virtual Machine Manager management environment.
One instance of the Virtual Machine Manager module in System Center 2012 Service Pack 1 can now manage up to 8,000 virtual machines. The capabilities of the management system have been more tightly integrated with Windows Server 2012 to produce a better managed Hyper-V environment.
VMware itself has predicted that 60% to 70% of server workloads were likely to be virtualized by the end of 2013. "We believe that 85% of enterprise workloads are potential targets for server virtualization. We believe about 15% of workloads are unlikely to be virtualized considering they are workloads that need bare-metal performance and unlikely to be amenable to allowing another layer of software to come between the application code and the CPU… This, in our opinion, suggests the greenfield opportunity for VMware is fast declining."
In a similar vein, Ghai saw OpenStack as an additional market-limiting threat. VMware has been able to out-execute some other would-be competitors, acknowledged Ghai, but OpenStack "is by design a more open solution, unlike VMware's Cloud Automation and Orchestration vCloud suite, which runs only with VMware's vSphere," he wrote.
"OpenStack is being developed with code and financial support from a wide variety of industry participants that could end up supporting its use in preference to VMware," he warned. Comments on his analysis tended to disagree with Ghai. One commenter pointed out that one of them had come from a VMware employee.
Cloud Connect returns to Silicon Valley, April 2-5, 2013, for four days of lectures, panels, tutorials and roundtable discussions on a comprehensive selection of cloud topics taught by leading industry experts. Join us in Silicon Valley to see new products, keep up-to-date on industry trends and create and strengthen professional relationships. Register for Cloud Connect now.
InformationWeek Elite 100Our data shows these innovators using digital technology in two key areas: providing better products and cutting costs. Almost half of them expect to introduce a new IT-led product this year, and 46% are using technology to make business processes more efficient.
The UC Infrastructure TrapWorries about subpar networks tanking unified communications programs could be valid: Thirty-one percent of respondents have rolled capabilities out to less than 10% of users vs. 21% delivering UC to 76% or more. Is low uptake a result of strained infrastructures delivering poor performance?