SPECIAL REPORT: Web 2.0 Summit   See more>>

4Chan Founder Challenges Facebook, Google On Identity

Facebook and Google have identity all wrong, according to 4Chan founder Chris Poole.
In a stunningly poignant address at Web 2.0 on Monday, Chris Poole, founder of controversial web sites 4Chan and Canvas, challenged Facebook, Google and online adventurers everywhere to think about identity not as a mirror, but as a prism; not as black and white, but multi-faceted; not as software would have us be, but as we truly are. Poole bemoaned Facebook's "one-size fits all" design, calling it a "fast food approach to identity."

Poole, who followed the likes of seasoned CEOs Marc Benioff of Salesforce.com and John Donahoe of eBay, could have easily been mistaken for one of their offspring, and the early Tweeting around his stand-and-deliver address focused on his youthfulness; but suddenly the crowd turned, capturing not the precociousness with which he spoke, but the actual ideas, spun like a trap.

His message, he said, wasn't about creating anonymity, but about users creating their own sense of identity. By focusing on allowing users to segment those with whom they share, Facebook and Google have missed the point that "it's not the audience, it's your context within that audience," Poole said. "It's not who you share with, but who you share as." Being able to share under an identity of your own choosing, he argued, leads to a much richer experience for everyone.

"Google and Facebook would have you believe that you are a mirror, that there's one reflection that you have; one idea of self," Poole added. "What you see in that mirror is what everybody else sees. But in fact, we're more like diamonds: you can look at people from any angle and see something totally different."

Poole said that Twitter gets identity right more than Google and Facebook, because it allows people to create handles for themselves. He pointed out that most people actually end up using their full names anyway. The problem as Poole sees it is that we risk the ability to be more expressive and creative.

Fritz Nelson is the editorial director for InformationWeek and the Executive Producer of TechWebTV.

Follow Fritz Nelson and InformationWeek:


Related Reading


More Insights




Currently we allow the following HTML tags in comments:

Single tags

These tags can be used alone and don't need an ending tag.

<br> Defines a single line break

<hr> Defines a horizontal line

Matching tags

These require an ending tag - e.g. <i>italic text</i>

<a> Defines an anchor

<b> Defines bold text

<big> Defines big text

<blockquote> Defines a long quotation

<caption> Defines a table caption

<cite> Defines a citation

<code> Defines computer code text

<em> Defines emphasized text

<fieldset> Defines a border around elements in a form

<h1> This is heading 1

<h2> This is heading 2

<h3> This is heading 3

<h4> This is heading 4

<h5> This is heading 5

<h6> This is heading 6

<i> Defines italic text

<p> Defines a paragraph

<pre> Defines preformatted text

<q> Defines a short quotation

<samp> Defines sample computer code text

<small> Defines small text

<span> Defines a section in a document

<s> Defines strikethrough text

<strike> Defines strikethrough text

<strong> Defines strong text

<sub> Defines subscripted text

<sup> Defines superscripted text

<u> Defines underlined text

InformationWeek encourages readers to engage in spirited, healthy debate, including taking us to task. However, InformationWeek moderates all comments posted to our site, and reserves the right to modify or remove any content that it determines to be derogatory, offensive, inflammatory, vulgar, irrelevant/off-topic, racist or obvious marketing/SPAM. InformationWeek further reserves the right to disable the profile of any commenter participating in said activities.

Disqus Tips To upload an avatar photo, first complete your Disqus profile. | View the list of supported HTML tags you can use to style comments. | Please read our commenting policy.
Subscribe to RSS

Resource Links