Android Kernel Security Above Average, Below Linux
An analysis of Android on an HTC Droid Incredible identified 359 code defects.
(click image for larger view)
Best Mobile Apps For Busy Professionals
Android devices may be viewed with more suspicion than rival smartphones because the more relaxed policing of Android Market apps suggests greater potential risk. But the openness of Android code turns out to be a benefit rather than a liability, at least from a security standpoint.
The Android kernel was found to have 0.47 defects per thousand lines of code, compared to an average of 1 defect per thousand lines of code.
But if Android is twice as good as the industry average, it's half as good as the Linux kernel in terms of defect density. The Android operating system is based upon Linux.
Coverity says this is to be expected given that Android-specific components have been written more recently and newer code tends to have a higher defect density than code that has endured years of static analysis, like the Linux kernel.
Coverity's analysis found 359 defects in the shipping version of Android on an HTC Droid Incredible, 88 of which it classifies as high-risk defects. These flaws include memory corruption bugs, illegal memory access bugs, and resource leaks.
It should be stressed that defects identified in this manner are not necessarily exploitable.
The firm concludes that Android's core platform is sold and that the Android-specific components need further attention to match the standards of Linux.
"We hope that by raising the visibility of the code across the supply chain for Android that the multiple software and device vendors that make Android devices can gain better visibility into the quality of the software components they are using and help hold each other accountable for delivering a high quality end product," Coverity's report says.
Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Google in the Enterprise SurveyThere's no doubt Google has made headway into businesses: Just 28 percent discourage or ban use of its productivity products, and 69 percent cite Google Apps' good or excellent mobility. But progress could still stall: 59 percent of nonusers distrust the security of Google's cloud. Its data privacy is an open question, and 37 percent worry about integration.
CIOs Get Smart About BIIT’s tried for years to simplify business intelligence efforts. Have visual analysis tools and Hadoop and NoSQL databases helped? Respondents to our 2014 InformationWeek Analytics, Business Intelligence, and Information Management Survey have a mixed outlook.
Join InformationWeek’s Lorna Garey and Mike Healey, president of Yeoman Technology Group, an engineering and research firm focused on maximizing technology investments, to discuss the right way to go digital.