All around the world, including Europe, China, Japan and the rest of Asia, handset makers are scrambling to maximize the pixel density of CCDs in their camera phone offerings. But what about optics?
A vicious camera phone war is raging in South Korea and, to a lesser extent
-- a much lesser extent -- here in the U.S. In fact, all around the world,
including Europe, China, Japan and the rest of Asia, handset makers are
scrambling to maximize the pixel density of CCDs in their camera phone
The Korean press
reported this week that LG Electronics plans to use Canon's camera phone
module for the world's first 6-megapixel -- and possibly even 7-megapixel --
camera phone. Soon, no doubt, other Korean manufactures will try to top LG and
announce 8- or 9-megapixel camera phones.
Somebody stop the madness!
Don't get me wrong, I'm all for improving the generally low quality of camera
phone pictures. But higher pixel density is just one metric of digital
photograph quality. What camera phones really need is better optics. For some
reason, the film-camera obsession with lenses didn't survive the transition to
consumer digital cameras, including the tiny digital cameras inside camera
Also, more pixels equals bigger file sizes. Does anybody really want your
phone taking 2-megabyte pictures?
No thanks. Camera phones should max out at 2 or 3 megapixels. Handset makers
should instead spend their money on superior lenses and electronics, a higher
quality LCD for viewing the pictures and some easy and quick way to get those
pictures off the phone and onto my PC.
A camera phone is only as good as its weakest link. And in the current
market, that weak link is lenses, not pixel density.
5 Top Federal Initiatives For 2015As InformationWeek Government readers were busy firming up their fiscal year 2015 budgets, we asked them to rate more than 30 IT initiatives in terms of importance and current leadership focus. No surprise, among more than 30 options, security is No. 1. After that, things get less predictable.