Palamida's Open Source Hit Parade - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Government // Enterprise Architecture
Commentary
12/16/2008
04:17 PM
Serdar Yegulalp
Serdar Yegulalp
Commentary
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Palamida's Open Source Hit Parade

Palamida's a firm that sells consultancy services for open source software, so it's not exactly a surprise that it would be listing "25 Hot Open Projects You Should Be Using Now To Save Money" in its recent report on the open source outlook for IT in 2009. It has posted the list at its blog with the headline "In A Time Of Less, Do More With Open Source."

Palamida's a firm that sells consultancy services for open source software, so it's not exactly a surprise that it would be listing "25 Hot Open Projects You Should Be Using Now To Save Money" in its recent report on the open source outlook for IT in 2009. It has posted the list at its blog with the headline "In A Time Of Less, Do More With Open Source."

This particular list's interesting, since it deals with actual programming tools and components, not just the usual raft of day-to-day applications. It's a more sophisticated approach than the usual "you can replace Word with OpenOffice.org and Photoshop with GIMP" mantra that passes for such discussion in most circles.

Palamida also supplies statistics for the cost to develop each package in-house (courtesy of OhLoh), but such numbers often seem slightly beside the point. Most people don't try to develop their own compression or video-encoding libraries in house; they tend to use commercial packages or existing platform libraries for such things. What might be more useful is a comparison of cost for packages where your choices consist of a) licensing a commercial library, b) developing something completely from scratch, or c) using an existing open source solution.

The most useful things on the list, from a cost-of-development perspective, are probably the Web 2.0 projects like jQuery. They provide the most immediate and visible benefits -- not just to developers but those who use sites driven by them. It's the sort of payoff that doesn't require a cost analysis to prove itself.

I'll be talking to Palamida in detail in a few days for more details.


Follow me on Twitter: http://twitter.com/syegulalp

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Slideshows
Data Science: How the Pandemic Has Affected 10 Popular Jobs
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  9/9/2020
Commentary
The Growing Security Priority for DevOps and Cloud Migration
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  9/3/2020
Commentary
Dark Side of AI: How to Make Artificial Intelligence Trustworthy
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  9/15/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
IT Automation Transforms Network Management
In this special report we will examine the layers of automation and orchestration in IT operations, and how they can provide high availability and greater scale for modern applications and business demands.
Slideshows
Flash Poll