FCC To Comcast: Stop Blocking Peer-To-Peer Content

The cable and Internet service provider may have interfered with up to 75% of shared-file traffic in certain areas, the Federal Communications Commission found.

K.C. Jones, Contributor

August 21, 2008

4 Min Read

The Federal Communications Commission has ordered Comcast to stop blocking peer-to-peer traffic by year's end, change its network management practices, and comply with several other requirements or face the possibility of an immediate injunction.

The FCC published a letter, statements from commissioners, and a press release on its Web site Wednesday, saying that Comcast's network management practices contravene federal policies that protect "the vibrant and open nature of the Internet." It also set forth a list of requirements the company must meet within 30 days.

Sena Fitzmaurice, senior director of corporate communications and government affairs for Comcast, declined to comment on the details of the order.

"We're reviewing the order and evaluating our options," she said during a brief interview Thursday.

Comcast customers had complained of problems using peer-to-peer applications like BitTorrent. The public interest groups Free Press and Public Knowledge lodged formal complaints with the FCC and petitioners requested a declaratory ruling against the company.

Comcast denied blocking the applications when complaints first surfaced, but The Associated Press and the Electronic Frontier Foundation ran tests and announced that Comcast did appear to interfere with the peer-to-peer software.

"Comcast changed its story and admitted that it did target its subscribers' peer-to-peer traffic for interference," the FCC explained in its statement. "The company initially claimed that it did so only during periods of peak network congestion and of heavy network traffic. Later, confronted with yet more evidence suggesting that interference was not limited in this manner, Comcast recast its position yet again and admitted that it interferes with peer-to-peer traffic regardless of the level of overall network congestion at the time and regardless of the time of day."

The FCC investigated and held hearings on the issue. This week, it announced that "Comcast has unduly interfered with Internet users' right to access content and applications" of their choice.

"Comcast's interference is far more invasive and widespread than the company first conceded," the FCC said.

The FCC said Comcast deployed network equipment to monitor its customers' content and block peer-to-peer connections.

"The Commission found that Comcast monitors its customers' connections using deep packet inspection and then determines how it will route some connections based not on their destinations but on their contents," the FCC wrote. "In essence, Comcast opens its customers' mail because it wants to deliver mail not based on the address on the envelope but on the type of letter contained therein. The Commission also found that Comcast's conduct affected Internet users on a widespread basis. Indeed, Comcast may have interfered with up to three-quarters of all peer-to-peer connections in certain communities." The FCC explained that Comcast has "an anticompetitive motive" to interfere with peer-to-peer applications." That's because BitTorrent and similar applications allow Internet users to view video that would cost them money through cable providers, including Comcast.

"Such video distribution poses a potential competitive threat to Comcast's video-on-demand service," the FCC said.

Although Comcast characterized its network management practices as minimally intrusive, the FCC said they created significant effects on customers who could not access content and use applications they chose.

"Customers, among other things, were unable to share music, watch video, or download software due to Comcast's misconduct," the FCC wrote.

Comcast had claimed it engaged in reasonable network management to deal with congestion, but the FCC said the methods were inadequate for achieving that goal. That's because Comcast managed the networks during low traffic times and failed to manage customers who use "extraordinary" amounts of bandwidth as long as they did not use applications Comcast targeted, according to the FCC. Further, those who used "disfavored applications" had their access blocked even if they did not use much bandwidth, the FCC said.

The FCC stated that Comcast compounded "anticompetitive harms" by its "unacceptable failure" to tell customers it interfered with some peer-to-peer applications.

"As a result, the Commission found that many consumers experiencing difficulty using only certain applications would not place blame on Comcast, where it belonged, but rather on the applications themselves, thus further disadvantaging those applications in the competitive marketplace," the FCC stated.

Comcast would have fulfilled the goals of federal Internet policy if it had blocked child pornography, pirated materials, or other illegal content, the FCC said.

Within 30 days, Comcast must: disclose details about its "discriminatory" network management practices; submit a compliance plan outlining how it will stop "discriminatory" practices by the end of the year; and tell customers and the FCC how its new network management practices will work.

If Comcast fails to meet the requirements, the FCC said it would automatically order interim injunctive relief and force Comcast to suspend its discriminatory network management practices. The FCC also threatened to schedule another hearing if Comcast fails to comply with the order.

Comcast has maintained that it managed its networks to control traffic and illegal activity. It has made several announcements about plans for protocol-agnostic network management practices. It has also launched trials of new network management practices in several locations.

About the Author(s)

Never Miss a Beat: Get a snapshot of the issues affecting the IT industry straight to your inbox.

You May Also Like

More Insights