InformationWeek Daily - Thursday, Feb 7, 2008
Why Vista Is Not The Best Argument For Linux
I've seen a number of people argue that Windows Vista, in all of its bloat and cost and lateness to market, is the best argument for switching to Linux. It's tempting, and there's a lot of truth to it, but at the same time I don't think it's a good idea to define yourself by what you're not. First, some personal perspective. I ditched Vista on my notebook some time ago and now use Ubuntu exclusively there. The whole thing went remarkably smoothly, and so far the single biggest issue I've had has been getting Flash to work in Firefox (it's not as straightforward as it looks, sadly). I haven't been able to do the same on my desktop yet, and probably won't be able to for some time, but I'm not as worried about that. Most people who go from one OS to the other make a habit of comparing the two. It's inevitable. If you have a choice of what to run, you want to have some idea of what you're gaining and losing. It's only normal to compare Linux to Windows or the Macintosh and make it clear what you're gaining and losing by switching from one to the other. Linus Torvalds himself said this in the recent, oft-quoted interview he had with the Linux Foundation: "If you act differently from Windows, even if you act in some ways better, it doesn't matter; better is worse if it's different." That's a big part of why Vista probably won't drive the masses into the arms of Linux. Flawed as Vista might be, it's still Windows in some form, and that in itself has a lot of retention power. Give up Windows and you also give up the support structure that goes with it -- the gurus you go to when things break, for instance. I get the impression there are two classes of people who trade Windows for Linux fairly readily: 1) experts, who can educate themselves without too much difficulty about what they're gaining and losing, and 2) total newcomers to computing in general, who don't have a lot of experience built up with computing to be traded up in the first place. Most of us probably fall somewhere between these two goalposts. That crowd is typically a hard sell, and needs something more compelling than "it isn't Windows" as an argument to switch. I've said in the past that I felt, by and large, that Linux was a success on its own merits and didn't need to compulsively compete with Windows. Now, I'm realizing that competition is inevitable -- but the way that competition is phrased also is important. If you define Linux's benefits entirely in the context of Windows' drawbacks, that may be a way to get initial attention -- but you have to have more than that in the long run. Read the rest of my blog post and let me know what you think by posting a comment. Serdar Yegulalp
www.informationweek.com "Aim for success, not perfection. Never give up your right to be wrong, because then you will lose the ability to learn new things and move forward with your life." - Dr. David M. Burns
CIA Monitors YouTube For Intelligence
U.S. spies are looking increasingly online for intelligence and they've become major consumers of social media.