SunGard Offers Virtual DR Serivice

Ever since its 2001 acquisition of Comdisco Availability Services SunGard has been the dominant player in the disaster recovery business offering a wide array of services, all based on physical hardware. Now, through partnerships wit VMWare and Double-Take, they're entering the twenty first century with a disaster recovery solution using virtual servers at the DR site to receive host based replication data.

Howard Marks, Network Computing Blogger

August 5, 2008

2 Min Read
InformationWeek logo in a gray background | InformationWeek

Ever since its 2001 acquisition of Comdisco Availability Services SunGard has been the dominant player in the disaster recovery business offering a wide array of services, all based on physical hardware. Now, through partnerships wit VMWare and Double-Take, they're entering the twenty first century with a disaster recovery solution using virtual servers at the DR site to receive host based replication data.Server virtualization has revolutionized the economics of the DR site by replacing the rack full of server that are doing nothing but receiving replication data and waiting for the day they get sent into the front lines with virtual servers. The one limit on how much you can save this way is that the virtual server hosts have to be beefy enough to handle the real application loads. Organizations with recovery point objectives (RPOs) of at least several hours, for some applications, can get a bit of a boost by combining VMWare Infrastructure with DR provider's "Shared Server" offerings that make hardware available when the customer's declared a disaster and Vmotioning machines to the shared servers when they're needed.

SunGard's taken this one step further by using a dedicated set of virtual servers as data catchers and moving those virtual machines to another pool of systems when a disaster strikes. This allows them to align the systems with the different requirements of data catching and application serving. Because the WAN bandwidth available natually limits the replication traffic data catchers can use high capacity SATA drives while the application servers run off high performance SAS or FC disk.

They've also taken a soup to nuts approach so the $1000-1200 a month a customer pays for the service includes everything but WAN bandwidth. No worries about power, cooling software maintenance Etc.

Most impressively their promising the while thing can be off the ground in 30 days. Most SME organizations would still be ordering hardware in 30 days not replicating their valuable data.

About the Author

Howard Marks

Network Computing Blogger

Howard Marks is founder and chief scientist at Deepstorage LLC, a storage consultancy and independent test lab based in Santa Fe, N.M. and concentrating on storage and data center networking. In more than 25 years of consulting, Marks has designed and implemented storage systems, networks, management systems and Internet strategies at organizations including American Express, J.P. Morgan, Borden Foods, U.S. Tobacco, BBDO Worldwide, Foxwoods Resort Casino and the State University of New York at Purchase. The testing at DeepStorage Labs is informed by that real world experience.

He has been a frequent contributor to Network Computing and InformationWeek since 1999 and a speaker at industry conferences including Comnet, PC Expo, Interop and Microsoft's TechEd since 1990. He is the author of Networking Windows and co-author of Windows NT Unleashed (Sams).

He is co-host, with Ray Lucchesi of the monthly Greybeards on Storage podcast where the voices of experience discuss the latest issues in the storage world with industry leaders.  You can find the podcast at: http://www.deepstorage.net/NEW/GBoS

Never Miss a Beat: Get a snapshot of the issues affecting the IT industry straight to your inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights