Follow IW:
Comments
Oldest First | Newest First | Threaded View
Re: CyanogenMod has had this feature for years!
To expand on George_B's post, I have had to pass over the most functional app because it asked for unnecessary permissions (like access to the Android system log) and the developer basically did not care to listen. Without rooting the phone, carrier-installed bloatware cannot be uninstalled. Even if there is rational for specific permissions, it appears that ad delivery libraries inherit the permissions of the app (http://mostconf.org/2012/papers/27.pdf) and I definitely do not want them poking around my phone. Google needs to step up to the security issues with Android, from misuse of permissions to the glacial pace of upgrades from carriers.
Good Grief, Google
As a professional software developer, any time I forcibly remove choices and control from my users, I do them a disservice. Yes, some users need heavy-handed automation and guidance. Those can certainly be defaults, but a user who desires to take matters into their own hands, once sufficiently warned, has every right to expect me not only to "allow" such activity, but also not to force my will upon the user by purposefully removing their choice.
As a consumer, no developer or manufacturer can or should tell us what we will or will not do with anything we purchase from them, specifically the hardware we buy which is our personal property after the sale is complete and solely our own to do with whatever we please. Period. The mere concept of a manufacturer thinking that they could possibly dictate or control capriciously what someone does or does not do with their hardware is ludicrous, insulting, and above all - futile and pointless.
I have no desire to materially harm any manufacturer or developer in any way (though I fantasize about choking the crap out of many of them). This is why I am so very much a fan of the Android AOSP, and the excellent work that has been done by teams like CyanogenMod and individuals like ChainFire and Koushik Dutta. Some manufacturers like HTC seem to have at least some notion that it is not antithetical to profitability to work with their customers and fellow developers who want to explore the hardware (HTC directly provides SDKs, APIs, and tools for rooting their devices), instead of against us (Samsung S4, anyone?). I applaud those manufacturers who have caught on, and I invite others to do the same. C'mon! Jump in. We're not sharks. We don't bite (too hard), and the water is fine!
Happy Holidays!
As a consumer, no developer or manufacturer can or should tell us what we will or will not do with anything we purchase from them, specifically the hardware we buy which is our personal property after the sale is complete and solely our own to do with whatever we please. Period. The mere concept of a manufacturer thinking that they could possibly dictate or control capriciously what someone does or does not do with their hardware is ludicrous, insulting, and above all - futile and pointless.
I have no desire to materially harm any manufacturer or developer in any way (though I fantasize about choking the crap out of many of them). This is why I am so very much a fan of the Android AOSP, and the excellent work that has been done by teams like CyanogenMod and individuals like ChainFire and Koushik Dutta. Some manufacturers like HTC seem to have at least some notion that it is not antithetical to profitability to work with their customers and fellow developers who want to explore the hardware (HTC directly provides SDKs, APIs, and tools for rooting their devices), instead of against us (Samsung S4, anyone?). I applaud those manufacturers who have caught on, and I invite others to do the same. C'mon! Jump in. We're not sharks. We don't bite (too hard), and the water is fine!
Happy Holidays!
Last straw
I've towed the Google line for more than a decade. Androids self starting, speed eating apps, contacts accessing apps have always been a scourge. I have been greatly enjoying app opps permission manager for a few weeks now. Im devastated that I no longer have that ability. I didn't know the consequences of updating. I wish I hadn't. So you all know, I also cannot turn off my gps now - perma on. I'll be changing op systems now. It's been a long time coming. Time I've wasted watching Google evolve into big brother.
Re: CyanogenMod has had this feature for years!
As an Android user, I personally would prefer to have more granularity in terms of privacy on some of these third party apps. Like the article points out, when an Android user downloads an app from Google Play, a splash screen appears telling the user what permissions the app must use, all in one list. You either take it or leave it.
I would rather be able to control these things through a console, which is what is described here. I think location, in particular, is something I am concerned about.
I would rather be able to control these things through a console, which is what is described here. I think location, in particular, is something I am concerned about.
Google Yanks Buried Android Privacy Feature
And geeks put it right back. Its a great feature I use it to control my apps. A firewall of sorts, they should of made it available to all.
Re: CyanogenMod has had this feature for years!
Any one here with more information on Sandbox as i guess android application run in an isolated area of the system that does not have access to the rest of the system's resources, unless access permissions are explicitly granted by the user when the application is installed.
Leave google now!
Google should be shut down and their management should be thrown in prison for life. Every site should be privacy-based, by law. I like these companies (because of their great privacy): DuckDuckGo, Ravetree, and HushMail. Use them. Tell everyone about them. The more people that use privacy-based sites, the better they will become. We have to support them if we want to win the war on privacy.
"Accidental" release not reassuring to privacy advocates
A feature that gives users some control over permissions granted to Andoid apps. What a great idea for privacy. Google released it "accidentally" and now pulls it back? Was this accident discovered after some developers started standing Google's privacy model on its head? This incident doesn't resolve anything, but that's just it. You kind of assume the worst when it comes to Google on privacy.
User privacy v. security
So it comes down to Droid users having to choose between privacy or security. Google needs to do the right thing and give users both instead forcing a choice otherwise all bets are off when it comes to competing with Apple.
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
White Papers
Current Issue
2017 State of IT ReportIn today's technology-driven world, "innovation" has become a basic expectation. IT leaders are tasked with making technical magic, improving customer experience, and boosting the bottom line -- yet often without any increase to the IT budget. How are organizations striking the balance between new initiatives and cost control? Download our report to learn about the biggest challenges and how savvy IT executives are overcoming them.
Video
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong 
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll
- Terms of Service
- Privacy Statement
- Legal Entities
- Copyright © 2017 UBM, All rights reserved
Tweet This
User Rank: Apprentice
12/14/2013 | 2:13:40 PM
Every free app that comes with ads can have their internet permissions taken away so ads never load. This is great for games and other apps that don't need the internet to function.
Having issues with apps starting by themselves that you don't want/use? You can take away their permissions to start themselves and their permissions to see the phone's state even if you can't uninstall them you can essentially disable the app by cutting off the permissions.
Many app permissions seem to over-reach what the app should really need access to. Do simple phone games really need to be able to see my contacts, call history, use the camera, etc.? Most of the time no and disabling these permissions is a great way to protect yourself especially when there are many malicious apps out there.
I will agree with Google that you can break apps. If you take away Facebook App's ability to use the internet the app won't work and an inexperienced user might not understand how to correct an issue caused by taking away permissions. It is certainly something for Advanced users.
This is one of the many awesome features of CyanogenMod and I'm sure other mods for Android too. I base my buying of Android phones based on which models are supported by CyanogenMod and this feature is one of the main reasons why I use CyanogenMod over Vanilla Android, HTC Sense, Motoblur, or any other Carrier/Manufacturer variations.