SEC Investigating Telsa For Not Disclosing Fatal Crash To Investors - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

03:06 PM

SEC Investigating Telsa For Not Disclosing Fatal Crash To Investors

Securities regulators are reportedly investigating Tesla Motors over its failure to inform investors that one of its cars involved in a fatal crash was operating in autopilot mode.

Google, Tesla And Apple Race For Electric, Autonomous Vehicle Talent
Google, Tesla And Apple Race For Electric, Autonomous Vehicle Talent
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

Tesla Motors is facing increased scrutiny involving the fatal accident involving its Model S car in Autopilot mode, as the Securities and Exchange Commission reportedly investigates the case.

Securities regulators are looking into whether Tesla should have informed investors that one of its cars operating in Autopilot mode was involved in a fatal accident, according to a Wall Street Journal report. An SEC investigation is in addition to the current investigation by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

SEC officials are reportedly investigating whether the fatality involving Tesla's Autopilot technology could be viewed as potentially having a significant effect on the financial health of the company and, as a result, would be considered "material" information. The SEC requires any publicly traded company to disclose material information in an SEC filing.

(Image: Sjoerd van der Wal/iStockphoto)

(Image: Sjoerd van der Wal/iStockphoto)

Last week, Tesla took Fortune magazine to task when the publication raised questions about Tesla's lack of disclosure of the accident to investors. 

Tesla, in response to the Fortune article, noted in a blog that the May 7 accident was reported to NHTSA on May 16 -- when it had just started its investigation. The company added that on May 18 its investigator was able to inspect the car and pull the complete vehicle logs, and that the company completed its review by the last week of May.

However, the company did not disclose any information about the fatal accident, or that the autopilot was activated at the time the accident occurred, when it submitted a filing to the SEC on May 18 for its plans to sell nearly 9.6 million shares, of which 2.8 million shares would be sold by its CEO Elon Musk. The Journal noted that the shares were then sold on May 18 and 19.

The Journal also noted that in previous SEC filings Tesla said that a successful liability law suit against the company's technology, including its Autopilot feature, could hurt its financial status.

[Read Drivers Prefer Autonomous Cars That Don't Kill Them.]

But in explaining its decision not to disclose the accident in the SEC filing Tesla noted in the blog post about the Fortune article that the Tesla Autopilot feature had been used in over 100 million miles of driving worldwide with "zero confirmed fatalities." As a result, Tesla said in the blog post:

Given the fact that the 'better-than-human' threshold had been crossed and robustly validated internally, news of a statistical inevitability did not materially change any statements previously made about the Autopilot system, its capabilities, or net impact on roadway safety.

Additionally, Musk told the Wall Street Journal, "I didn't know there had been an Autopilot incident at the time of the fundraising ... What we told NHTSA [on May 16] was just that somebody died -- it wasn't that there was an Autopilot incident. I also don't think it's material, but I didn't know about it."

On the first trading day that followed its June 30 announcement about the fatal accident and how its Autopilot was activated at the time, Tesla's shares climbed nearly 2% to close at $216.50 on July 1.

Dawn Kawamoto is an Associate Editor for Dark Reading, where she covers cybersecurity news and trends. She is an award-winning journalist who has written and edited technology, management, leadership, career, finance, and innovation stories for such publications as CNET's ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Charlie Babcock
Charlie Babcock,
User Rank: Author
7/12/2016 | 7:10:37 PM
How is Auto-Pilot different from cruise control?
This is a debatable situation. Is every fatal crash involving Chevy cruise control investigated by the SEC as possible withholding of a material fact? No, it's not. But a crash involving Tesla Auto-Pilot is different. How?
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

How SolarWinds Changed Cybersecurity Leadership's Priorities
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  5/26/2021
How CIOs Can Advance Company Sustainability Goals
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  5/26/2021
IT Skills: Top 10 Programming Languages for 2021
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  5/21/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
Current Issue
Planning Your Digital Transformation Roadmap
Download this report to learn about the latest technologies and best practices or ensuring a successful transition from outdated business transformation tactics.
Flash Poll