Federal Government IT Priorities: Vision Vs. Reality

Bold plans for cybersecurity, disaster recovery planning, virtualization and data center consolidation are hindered by 2014 budget realities.

Michael Biddick, CEO, Fusion PPT

August 9, 2013

3 Min Read
InformationWeek logo in a gray background | InformationWeek

InformationWeek Green -  Aug 12, 2013

InformationWeek Green - Aug 12, 2013

InformationWeek Green

InformationWeek Green


Download the entire August 2013 issue of InformationWeek Government, distributed in an all-digital format (registration required).


Tech Priorities

Tech Priorities

A raft of White House directives and budget proposals over the past year has added pressure on federal agencies to make government information more accessible and secure -- and do it all with fewer resources. Legislators, meanwhile, have been drumming up various bills aimed at getting the government to better manage the more than $80 billion it spends annually on IT and related services. For federal IT leaders, however, the list of priorities remains far more complex than what's emanating from either end of Pennsylvania Avenue, according to InformationWeek's new Federal Government IT Priorities Survey.

Topping that list of federal IT priorities as agencies head into fiscal year 2014 (starting in October) are cybersecurity, disaster recovery planning, data records management, virtualization and data center consolidation (see chart at right). Then there's the standard heavy lifting around storage, application performance, and upgrading PCs and laptops. Infrastructure projects in particular got put on the back burner of many agencies as they scrambled to address higher-profile needs, notes Vance Hitch, a senior adviser at Deloitte Consulting and former CIO of the Department of Justice. "But you can only postpone equipment refreshes for so long," he says.

While the White House announced in April that it was budgeting $82 billion for federal IT in fiscal 2014, a 2.1% increase from 2013, dollars are still tight. When asked about the biggest barriers to effectively executing IT projects at their organizations, 39% of respondents to our survey cited the lack of budget as No. 1. That's up from 35% a year ago. The No. 2 barrier, cited by 27% of respondents, is conflicting or poorly defined requirements.

2014 Federal Government IT Priorities

Report Cover

Report Cover

Our report on government IT priorities for fiscal year 2014 is free with registration

The report includes the complete findings, with more than two dozen charts, from this year's annual survey of federal IT leaders. Get This And All Our Reports

Compounding those pressures will be increased scrutiny expected under the administration's new "data-driven results" policy. Agency leaders, who are still getting used to the Office of Management and Budget's PortfolioStat IT investment review sessions, will soon be asked to "show me the data" to prove that IT projects are worth the investment.

When it comes to federal IT spending, "there are more tensions between OMB and agencies" than ever before, says one former federal CIO who asked not to be identified. Sequestration is one reason, he says. Meantime, the mandates for IPv6 and HSPD-12 common identification standards for federal employees and contractors haven't been relaxed, "but there is even less funding," the former CIO says.

Two-thirds (66%) of the 155 federal government IT leaders who responded to this year's survey said their top priorities are being driven by agency or organizational initiatives. About half (48%) said their priorities are being dictated by OMB directives or by policies from federal CIO Steven VanRoekel's office. More than a third pointed to legislative requirements (36%), and 32% said they were complying with National Institute of Standards and Technology and similar policy standards.

To read the rest of the article,
download the August 2013 issue of InformationWeek Government.

About the Author

Michael Biddick

CEO, Fusion PPT

As CEO of Fusion PPT, Michael Biddick is responsible for overall quality and innovation. Over the past 15 years, Michael has worked with hundreds of government and international commercial organizations, leveraging his unique blend of deep technology experience coupled with business and information management acumen to help clients reduce costs, increase transparency and speed efficient decision making while maintaining quality. Prior to joining Fusion PPT, Michael spent 10 years with a boutique-consulting firm and Booz Allen Hamilton, developing enterprise management solutions. He previously served on the academic staff of the University of Wisconsin Law School as the Director of Information Technology. Michael earned a Master's of Science from Johns Hopkins University and a dual Bachelor's degree in Political Science and History from the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Michael is also a contributing editor at InformationWeek Magazine and Network Computing Magazine and has published over 50 recent articles on Cloud Computing, Federal CIO Strategy, PMOs and Application Performance Optimization. He holds multiple vendor technical certifications and is a certified ITIL v3 Expert.

Never Miss a Beat: Get a snapshot of the issues affecting the IT industry straight to your inbox.

You May Also Like


More Insights