Consumer Privacy Protections Need Review, GAO Tells Congress - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Comments
Consumer Privacy Protections Need Review, GAO Tells Congress
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Tom Murphy
50%
50%
Tom Murphy,
User Rank: Author
11/22/2013 | 1:52:32 PM
Short Arm of the Law
I'm afraid the GAO is about a decade late and a bit myopic in its report on consumer privacy.  Yes, there are needs for greater protections and that has been obvious since the turn of the century.  And yes, it would be nice to see limits on what companies can do, but how would Congress impose those on web publishers outside the US?  Another problem: how could anyone (or any government) hope to retrieve or scrap all the consumer information that has already been gathered and collated. There are corporate and government dossiers now on hundreds of millions -- perhaps billions -- of individuals around the globe. 

Of course, we don't have to go on this way. The questions are what should we do, and how can we bring everyone together to do it?   Any ideas out there?
Michael Endler
50%
50%
Michael Endler,
User Rank: Author
11/22/2013 | 1:53:31 PM
It's sure to be a mess
"[T]here is a real need to give consumers control of their information when it is used for a purpose beyond that for which it was originally provided" vs. "A one-size-fits-all approach would be overly burdensome and restrictive. They hold that restrictions on the collection and use of personal data would boost compliance costs, inhibit innovation, and keep consumers from receiving relevant advertising and beneficial products and services."

I think these two lines cut to the heart of the matter. Like most debates of this kind, lawmakers are going to debate consumer protection against business interests. Given how recent battles of this sort have played out, I'm not optimistic that lawmakers will have any idea how to handle this one (e.g. "It's prehistoric for companies to discriminate on the basis of gender identity/ sexuality" vs. "If we make it illegal for companies to discriminate, it will invite too many lawsuits, which will hurt businesses and cost Americans jobs," or "we have established a consumer proection agency" vs. "but we don't want to confirm its leader"). It's a complicated issue; consumers are not adequately protected, but I agree that sweeping policies and regulations aren't always the best approach either. Getting anything done will take delicacy, but this issue is, unfortunately, one that can be easily hijacked by ideological jingoism. The fact that this topic involves not only individual vs. business, but also technology - something with which lawmakers are generally inept and short-sighted - only makes the outlook that much messier.
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
11/22/2013 | 3:55:37 PM
Re: It's sure to be a mess
Privacy is a thankless debate. Consumers say they want it but act otherwise. Privacy will never be practical online. The Internet is a surveillance system. Governments won't allow it to be any other way and businesses won't offer privacy services because so few will pay. And why offer "secure email" when that really means "secure until legally otherwise"? That said, we do need some rules of the road to avoid having our data strip-mined and sold over and over.
WKash
50%
50%
WKash,
User Rank: Author
12/3/2013 | 8:59:24 PM
Re: A challenge that must be addressed
Bill, thanks for summing up the essence of viewpoints here and keeping the conversation going forward.  At the end of the day, I think consumers would be well served if we as a nation drafted the equivalent of a digital Bill of Rights, that would among other things: allow citizens to 1) be able to search and view the data being captured about them, and 2) have the right to correct or remedy incorrect information about them.


2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

News
Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Slideshows
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Commentary
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll