A Better Way Than SOA?
Here in the summer of $4-a-gallon gas, it's serious business to liken something to a honkin' SUV. Yet that's how we portray service-oriented architectures in the illustration on the cover of <i>InformationWeek</i> magazine this week. We're raising the question about development methods that people are asking about SUVs: Do I need, and can I afford, all that horsepower?
Here in the summer of $4-a-gallon gas, it's serious business to liken something to a honkin' SUV. Yet that's how we portray service-oriented architectures in the illustration on the cover of InformationWeek magazine this week. We're raising the question about development methods that people are asking about SUVs: Do I need, and can I afford, all that horsepower?In his article, Roger Smith makes the case for Web-oriented architectures as a simpler alternative to SOA, one that's too often overlooked. Smith notes the appeal of SOA to businesses, but also the simmering dissatisfaction. About a third say SOAs fell short of expectations in our research, and almost 60% say it increased complexity. Just 10% say it exceeded expectations. Writes Smith:
The lesson is that more often than not, simpler is better. A growing number of companies are finding that lower-visibility Web-oriented architecture (WOA) developments, spawned through grassroots movements, are a better route to the service-oriented architecture.
The risk and complexity that comes with an SOA are a bit like getting 13 miles to the gallon. It makes perfect sense -- if it's the only way to get the job done right. But for a possible alternative, give Smith's article a read. And please share your own experiences with us.
(Click here to see our SOA-as-SUV cover art, and here for PDFs of any InformationWeek magazine issue. Free registration required for the PDFs.)
About the Author
You May Also Like
2024 InformationWeek US IT Salary Report
May 29, 20242022 State of ITOps and SecOps
Jun 21, 2022