A Reader Says: Lame Social Networking Worse Than None At All - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Software // Social
10:04 AM
Chris Murphy
Chris Murphy
Connect Directly

A Reader Says: Lame Social Networking Worse Than None At All

A cautionary tale for those going half-hearted into the social part of social networking.

After my column on Toyota's plan to launch a social network for owners of its upcoming electric and plug-in hybrid cars, I got a great email from a reader who had a run-in with his own automaker's social network.

I'll drop the automaker's name, but this reader was invited to join a "private online community," to offer feedback on ad campaigns and even some products. Here's his reaction:

It turns out that these discussions are highly moderated and the input from [company] is very corporate. Being initially very positive to the opportunity to interact directly with [company], I now loathe the company. When we bought our last car about a year ago, we didn't even consider [company]. Why? In my opinion, when you run a discussion forum, there has to be a sense of engagement and passion. When you are just served legalese and carefully crafted corporate answers to users that bring up valid concerns, you lose trust in the people running the site, and worse the company. The problem when a corporation is the editor and censor, you cannot really trust what's being said.

This isn't a universal reaction to this particular community. I searched some independent discussion forums and found threads about this network, and some car owners like it--mostly for the occasional swag that comes with participating, and for the satisfaction of feeling like they're talking to top people. There was also much discussion about how you go about getting invited, since you have to be asked to join, and how you'll be cut from the community if you don't log in regularly.

Two thoughts on this.

One, if you create a social network, you play by Facebook's rules, regardless of how you envision your forum. Facebook has set the standard for the engagement, freedom, and candor people will expect. It's like in the early web days, when smart CIOs realized eBay and Amazon would be the standard their websites would be compared to. If your company wants a forum that's safer and more controlled than Facebook, well, it will be seen for the lameness that it is.

Two, I think we're also seeing here how social networking is changing the expectations generally for communicating with companies. It sounds from this reader's description like what this carmaker really wanted was not so much an online community as a market research panel--a captive audience to which it could ask questions and get back data and reactions. But people don't come to a forum and wait to be asked questions. They expect to be able to ask questions and get straight answers from human beings. And they expect to be able to talk with each other, and for people from the company to join but not control.

One last thought. This person (who's a company president) didn't even consider buying his next car from this company specifically because of his bad experience in this community. Just a warning, in case anyone is wondering how big the stakes are in getting social right.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Deb Donston-Miller
Deb Donston-Miller,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/21/2011 | 10:05:48 PM
re: A Reader Says: Lame Social Networking Worse Than None At All
Companies are probably underestimating the resources they will have to devote to getting social right, especially when a platform like Facebook is used for customer service. I have seen companies that respond to every complaint or negative statement lodged on a social networking site with something like, "Please contact us at (800) 555-5555 to discuss this further." That's likely the safest route in terms of de-escalation, but perhaps not the smartest when it comes to being seen as a company that "gets" social and is using social networking platforms in a way that engages and supports all users. Social isn't easy, to be sure, but it's worth doing right in the end.

Deb Donston-Miller
Contributing Editor, The BrainYard
Alex Dunne
Alex Dunne,
User Rank: Apprentice
6/16/2011 | 6:53:08 PM
re: A Reader Says: Lame Social Networking Worse Than None At All
If a company is going to launch a community about its products, it better be prepared for its angry customers to vent their frustration. Clamping down on that, or just plain ignoring an angry discussion thread, speaks volumes about the company's real aims with its online community.
The State of Chatbots: Pandemic Edition
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  9/10/2020
Deloitte on Cloud, the Edge, and Enterprise Expectations
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  9/14/2020
Data Science: How the Pandemic Has Affected 10 Popular Jobs
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  9/9/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Current Issue
IT Automation Transforms Network Management
In this special report we will examine the layers of automation and orchestration in IT operations, and how they can provide high availability and greater scale for modern applications and business demands.
Flash Poll