Voice Over IP's Quality Surprise - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Hardware & Infrastructure
News
7/8/2005
10:20 AM
Paul Travis
Paul Travis
Features
50%
50%

Voice Over IP's Quality Surprise

Despite improvements, quality and reliability of VoIP calls don't match public-network calls, study finds

There's been a great deal of improvement in the quality and reliability of voice-over-IP calls since the early days when a computer equipped with a microphone and speakers was connected to another over a dial-up connection to make calls. The result: a barely audible sound stream filled with gaps, delays, and distortion. Now, VoIP calls are made from traditional phones over high-speed Internet connections using services from hundreds of providers, including some of the nation's largest phone companies.

Still, VoIP calls have a long way to go before they can match the quality and reliability of conventional phone calls made over the U.S. public-switched telephone network, which for more than a century has set the standard for voice calls.

Those are the conclusions reached by a first-of-its-kind study by Keynote Systems Inc., which analyzed the quality and reliability of more than 154,000 VoIP calls and 9,000 public-network calls placed between May 21 and June 25. Keynote tested six VoIP service providers and seven network carriers, including residential cable modem and DSL providers, as well as business-class T1 carriers.

"VoIP performance across most providers is nowhere close to the dial-tone reliability and clarity of communications that consumers have become used to over the years," says Dharmesh Thakker, Keynote's senior project manager. The company plans to release some of the research results this week.

Among the highlights: Keynote was able to complete VoIP calls 96.9% of the time, compared with 99.9% for calls made over the public network. Voice quality for VoIP calls on average was rated at 3.5 out of 5, compared with 3.9 for public-network calls and 3.6 for cellular phone calls. And the amount of delay the audio signals experienced was 295 milliseconds for VoIP calls, compared with 139 milliseconds for public-network calls. A delay of 300 milliseconds can produce poor voice quality, according to Keynote.

Voice Over IP

"Generally speaking, the quality isn't there," Thakker says. "For the amount of money consumers pay each month, they expect pretty high voice quality. On average, VoIP isn't a whole lot better than wireless."

That isn't slowing the move to VoIP. More than 1.1 million residential customers used VoIP services at the end of 2004, a number that should grow to 28.5 million by 2009, according to the Yankee Group research firm. That compares with more than 110 million regular phone lines.

Keynote tested VoIP and public-network calls between New York and San Francisco using services from AT&T, Lingo, Packet8, Skype, Verizon, and Vonage. It tested those services over various carrier networks, including cable-TV providers Comcast and Time Warner Cable, local phone companies SBC Communications and Verizon Communications, and long-distance companies AT&T, Sprint, and UUnet. It picked those companies because they're among the leading providers and carriers in each city.

VoIP research is a new market for Keynote, which has specialized in Web-performance testing since 1996. To conduct the VoIP tests, the company rented an apartment in each coastal city and subscribed to VoIP services just like any consumer. In each apartment, Keynote obtained high-speed Internet service from the local phone company and cable-TV company in each area, as well as from three long-distance networks. Keynote set up automated dialing, transmitting, and recording equipment to conduct the test.

The goal of the study was to assess the market readiness of service providers in those two cities by comparing the quality of their service to that provided by the public network, comparing the service providers to each other, and analyzing the effect the underlying network carrier had on service quality, Thakker says.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Previous
1 of 2
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

News
Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Slideshows
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Commentary
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
White Papers
Slideshows
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Sponsored Video
Flash Poll