New Year's Resolutions for Vendors and Buyers - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Software // Information Management
Commentary
1/4/2007
08:01 PM
Tony Byrne
Tony Byrne
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New Year's Resolutions for Vendors and Buyers

When I talk to vendors about customer projects that were seriously delayed or that failed outright, the response is invariably: "implementation problem." That's code-speak for the customer or integrator (or both) screwing up. Sometimes customers are blissfully ignorant of their unreadiness to implement new technology, but I suspect more commonly implementation troubles result from a poor product fit.

When I talk to software vendors about customer projects that were seriously delayed or that failed outright, the response is almost invariably: "implementation problem." That's code-speak for the customer or integrator (or both) screwing up. Sometimes this rings true, though I suspect more commonly implementation troubles result from a poor product fit.

In a world in which vendors dominate marketplace conversations -- by underwriting conferences, the trade press, Webinars, white papers and trade associations -- assigning blame to others for our industry's ridiculously low success rate is weaseling out.I'm not advocating vendor altruism, but a longer-term view of survival based on incremental customer value rather than customer lock-in. This means targeting more than just "standing up" an initial implementation so that license revenue can be recognized on the books. It means working with customers to define what constitutes business success and doing what it takes to get them there.

Sometimes customers are to blame when things go wrong. For example, we frequently see companies issuing software RFPs amid blissful ignorance of their own unreadiness to implement new technology. Vendors can typically sense this right away, but not bidding means losing the contract to someone else; many vendors will still beg off, but most will press on, typically leading to unhappy customer and winning supplier alike (except the supplier got paid!).

So a New Year's resolution for you, the customer: look beyond content management as a discrete project and think through what it really means for the business to manage content better. If you're like most enterprises, this entails ample content and process analysis, along with reality-testing new approaches. Only when you're sure you need new technology to get to the next level should you start researching vendors. When you get to that point, CMS Watch is happy to help.

Tony Byrne is founder and lead analyst at CMS Watch. Write him at [email protected].When I talk to vendors about customer projects that were seriously delayed or that failed outright, the response is invariably: "implementation problem." That's code-speak for the customer or integrator (or both) screwing up. Sometimes customers are blissfully ignorant of their unreadiness to implement new technology, but I suspect more commonly implementation troubles result from a poor product fit.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
News
Getting Machine Learning into Production: MLOps
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  6/26/2019
Slideshows
DeveloperWeek NY and MongoDB World Tackle Transformation
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  6/25/2019
Commentary
GDPR One Year Later: Was the Hype Worth It?
Guest Commentary, Guest Commentary,  6/19/2019
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
A New World of IT Management in 2019
This IT Trend Report highlights how several years of developments in technology and business strategies have led to a subsequent wave of changes in the role of an IT organization, how CIOs and other IT leaders approach management, in addition to the jobs of many IT professionals up and down the org chart.
Slideshows
Flash Poll