Physicians Say IT Is Still The Enemy - InformationWeek
Healthcare // Clinical Information Systems
02:35 PM
Paul Cerrato
Paul Cerrato
Connect Directly
[Dark Reading Crash Course] Finding & Fixing Application Security Vulnerabilitie
Sep 14, 2017
Hear from a top applications security expert as he discusses key practices for scanning and securi ...Read More>>

Physicians Say IT Is Still The Enemy

Understanding the difference between how academic and community physicians think can foster more productive relationships--and perhaps less tension.

InformationWeek Healthcare Digital Issue - May, 2011 InformationWeek Green
Download the entire May, 2011 issue of InformationWeek Healthcare, distributed in an all-digital format as part of our Green Initiative
(Registration required.)
We will plant a tree for each of the first 5,000 downloads.

SaaS and E-Discovery Dangers

I doubt many CIOs consider the physicians they work with enemies. But I venture to guess that some physicians do consider IT as the enemy.

Some of the animosity stems from statements like this, made by Jason Burke, of the SAS Institute, a business analytics company: "Evidence-based medicine, personal electronic health records [are causing] a transformative shift toward more information-based decision making related to patient care. …"

While most academic physicians will agree with this stance, many community doctors see evidence-based medicine (EBM), clinical practice guidelines, and decision-support systems as "cookbook medicine."

They simply don't believe EBM will have the transformative effect on patient care that Burke suggests. In their minds, medicine is as much art as science, and as such can't be distilled into a series of evidence-based guidelines and rules.

Many clinicians also question the philosophical assumptions upon which EBM is based. Understanding this skepticism is the first step toward getting buy-in from physicians who resist e-health records and clinical decision-support systems implementation.

One source of skepticism is that EBM-generated practice guidelines are usually based on the results of large clinical trials. One problem with these trials is their exclusion criteria. A trial evaluating a drug for hypertension, for example, often includes patients that have only hypertension. Such patient populations have to be free of any other chronic disorders that might skew the results.

Such exclusion criteria help investigators get pure data, but this doesn't mimic the real world, where doctors often treat patients suffering from a variety of these "co-morbidities."

Another source of skepticism is something called a Type 2 statistical error. Community physicians place a good deal of faith in their own clinical experience. When they see a patient respond to some treatment that doesn't have the blessing of the experts, many are inclined to believe their own eyes.

What they might be seeing in a clinical trial is a Type 2 error, which occurs when a study enrolls too few patients and the data analysis jumps to the conclusion that treatment X doesn't help disease Y. To detect relatively small but statistically significant effects of any treatment, one's sample size--namely the number of patients enrolled in the trial--has to be large enough. If not, you get false-negative results.

A 2004 review of the research shows that more than 300 studies have come to false-negative conclusions because their patient size was too small. Reason enough to question EBM.

It's unlikely the chasm between clinical experience and clinical experiment will be resolved anytime soon, but knowing it exists can help IT execs be more sensitive to the resistance they meet, and hopefully help them devise a more effective strategy to get buy-in despite these reservations. Coming up with such a strategy just might turn "enemies" into allies.

Paul Cerrato is editor of InformationWeek Healthcare. Write to him at Join our Mobile Application Smackdown and nominate your favorite health and telehealth apps.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
How Enterprises Are Attacking the IT Security Enterprise
To learn more about what organizations are doing to tackle attacks and threats we surveyed a group of 300 IT and infosec professionals to find out what their biggest IT security challenges are and what they're doing to defend against today's threats. Download the report to see what they're saying.
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
2017 State of IT Report
In today's technology-driven world, "innovation" has become a basic expectation. IT leaders are tasked with making technical magic, improving customer experience, and boosting the bottom line -- yet often without any increase to the IT budget. How are organizations striking the balance between new initiatives and cost control? Download our report to learn about the biggest challenges and how savvy IT executives are overcoming them.
Twitter Feed
Sponsored Live Streaming Video
Everything You've Been Told About Mobility Is Wrong
Attend this video symposium with Sean Wisdom, Global Director of Mobility Solutions, and learn about how you can harness powerful new products to mobilize your business potential.
Flash Poll