Google Glass Enterprise Edition: What We Know So Far - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Mobile // Mobile Devices
News
7/9/2015
06:06 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

Google Glass Enterprise Edition: What We Know So Far

The rumored Google Glass Enterprise Edition looks more like a maintenance release to placate the company's handful of Glass at Work partners until the company finds a way to reimagine and reinvigorate the project.

10 Great Websites For Learning Programming
10 Great Websites For Learning Programming
(Click image for larger view and slideshow.)

The next version of Google Glass appears to be intended for businesses. According to a report from 9to5Google, Google is testing an "Enterprise Edition" of its computerized eyewear.

The website reports that the device will have a larger prism display and an Intel Atom processor, which presumably will offer better performance and battery life. The initial consumer-oriented version of Glass came with a TI OMAP 4430 processor. Last November, The Wall Street Journal reported Google's intention to shift to an Intel chip.

In an email to InformationWeek, Google confirmed only that work on Glass continues, as the company said when it ended the Google Glass Explorer program in January. "The team is heads down building the future of the product and we're not commenting on rumor or speculation," a spokesperson said in an email.

A glimpse of the future of Glass appears to have surfaced at the Federal Communications Commission. Recent regulatory filings indicate that Google submitted a device designated "GG1" for FCC evaluation and approval.

(Image: Google)

(Image: Google)

"GG" likely stands for "Google Glass." Also, appropriately for a device worn on the head, the FCC SAR evaluation documents mention "head exposure" and "head phantoms," models of the human head used for radio-frequency exposure testing by the agency. They also describe the device as "irregular" in shape, which fits Glass.

An additional point of association with Google Glass: The Google regulatory compliance officer corresponding with the FCC is Warwick Wong, whose name showed up in previous FCC filings related to Glass. Wong's LinkedIn profile says that he works for Google [X], the experimental technology group that oversaw Glass until earlier this year, when the project was moved to Tony Fadell's Nest home automation group.

Whether Fadell is overseeing Google Glass Enterprise Edition isn't clear. In May, at Google's Zeitgeist conference in London, Fadell described that sounds like a substantial revision of Google Glass to the Financial Times: "We've decided to go and look at every detail, have no sacred cows and figure out the way forward," he said. "I have a really engaged team, they're really excited about the future and expect more things to come soon."

Google Glass Enterprise Edition doesn't appear to be all that exciting – the one notable innovation reported by 9to5Google is a Google-made external battery pack to extend device availability in the field. Given Nest's focus on the consumer market segment, it would make sense if Fadell's effort to rethink Glass ends up as a consumer product, at least initially.

The Wall Street Journal last year said Google still views Glass primarily as a consumer device, noting that fewer than 5% of the more than 300 employees working on Glass (at the time) focused on Glass at Work, the company's enterprise wearable program.

Historically, Google has tended to rely on partners to adapt its mass-market products and services to enterprises. Assuming that's still the case, Google Glass Enterprise Edition looks more like a maintenance release to placate the company's handful of Glass at Work partners until Fadell's group finds a way to reimagine and reinvigorate the project.

Thomas Claburn has been writing about business and technology since 1996, for publications such as New Architect, PC Computing, InformationWeek, Salon, Wired, and Ziff Davis Smart Business. Before that, he worked in film and television, having earned a not particularly useful ... View Full Bio

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
GAProgrammer
50%
50%
GAProgrammer,
User Rank: Ninja
7/13/2015 | 1:01:55 PM
Re: Glass's Progress
Not to mention the fact that the expectations of privacy are greatly reduced when you are at work!
danielcawrey
50%
50%
danielcawrey,
User Rank: Ninja
7/11/2015 | 1:20:11 PM
Re: Glass's Progress
The consumer applications for Google Glass just aren't available – yet. 

They will be someday, but I think this type of technology is currently more well-suited for an enterprise environment rather than people wearing them walking down the street. 
Brian.Dean
50%
50%
Brian.Dean,
User Rank: Ninja
7/10/2015 | 4:01:10 AM
Re: Glass's Progress
Initially, a replacement prescription lens can also cause a headache. It will be interesting to see if consumers are able to identify whether Glass (the technology) or the lens is the cause of discomfort.

A few weeks ago, I came across an AC repair/maintenance business that was utilizing a clamp meter and a Google Glass in their ad campaign. It would be interesting if the business was deriving actual value from the use of Google Glass. For instance, if a famous landmark can be displayed then, historic readings of an AC should also be possible.  
Thomas Claburn
50%
50%
Thomas Claburn,
User Rank: Author
7/9/2015 | 10:06:05 PM
Re: Glass's Progress
One thing the FCC does not test for, that Google warns about, is the possibility of headaches from extended use of Glass.
Gary_EL
50%
50%
Gary_EL,
User Rank: Ninja
7/9/2015 | 8:50:48 PM
Glass's Progress
It's good to see that a lot of thought is going into radio-frequency exposure; concerns about dangers the dangers therein are important to first quantify and then minimize. I still believe that this product will have its early life as a product for professional users rather than consumers, and will find it's way into more widespread use only as the price comes down.
Commentary
What Becomes of CFOs During Digital Transformation?
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  2/4/2020
News
Fighting the Coronavirus with Analytics and GIS
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  2/3/2020
Slideshows
IT Careers: 10 Job Skills in High Demand This Year
Cynthia Harvey, Freelance Journalist, InformationWeek,  2/3/2020
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
Video
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Slideshows
Flash Poll