Outrageous Royalty Ruling To Be Reviewed - InformationWeek

InformationWeek is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

IoT
IoT
Mobile
Commentary
3/23/2007
06:21 PM
Richard Martin
Richard Martin
Commentary
50%
50%

Outrageous Royalty Ruling To Be Reviewed

While the Bush administration may not be capable of saying "Oops, we screwed up," it seems that another part of the federal government -- the U.S. Copyright Review Board -- might have had a change of heart. After facing a storm of outrage, the board this week agreed to review its decision to impose staggering new royalty payments on I

While the Bush administration may not be capable of saying "Oops, we screwed up," it seems that another part of the federal government -- the U.S. Copyright Review Board -- might have had a change of heart. After facing a storm of outrage, the board this week agreed to review its decision to impose staggering new royalty payments on Internet radio broadcasts -- fees that would swiftly put most Web broadcasters out of business and bring an end to the brief flourishing of Internet radio.Under the new plan, the royalties that Web broadcasters pay to copyright holders via SoundExchange, the collections arm of the Recording Industry Association of America, would climb from .0008 cents per "performance" to .0019 cents in 2010, sending total annual fees sky-high. Not only that, but the new structure -- essentially created by the RIAA and approved by the CRB, which, believe it or not, is a division of the Library of Congress -- is retroactive to January 2006

Most Web broadcasters are enthusiasts who make little if any profit from their stations and who have an idealistic sense of mission around promoting and disseminating new, hard-to-find, and innovative music.

I've written elsewhere about Pandora, the create-your-own-music-channel site based on the Music Genome Project, which has become for many people both a source of great new music and a symbol of the possibilities offered by Internet broadcasting. According to founder Tim Westergren, Pandora would be looking at "millions and millions of dollars" in additional fees -- and would be unable to continue operations. On his blog, Westergren called the original plan "an utterly ridiculous ruling that renders any form of Internet radio noneconomic."

A coalition of Web broadcasters, independent music labels, and public radio stations has mounted a campaign to reverse the ruling, and now it seems the CRB will listen. Whether we all get to listen to new music over the Internet remains to be seen.

We welcome your comments on this topic on our social media channels, or [contact us directly] with questions about the site.
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
InformationWeek Is Getting an Upgrade!

Find out more about our plans to improve the look, functionality, and performance of the InformationWeek site in the coming months.

News
Remote Work Tops SF, NYC for Most High-Paying Job Openings
Jessica Davis, Senior Editor, Enterprise Apps,  7/20/2021
Slideshows
Blockchain Gets Real Across Industries
Lisa Morgan, Freelance Writer,  7/22/2021
Commentary
Seeking a Competitive Edge vs. Chasing Savings in the Cloud
Joao-Pierre S. Ruth, Senior Writer,  7/19/2021
White Papers
Register for InformationWeek Newsletters
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
2021 State of ITOps and SecOps Report
This new report from InformationWeek explores what we've learned over the past year, critical trends around ITOps and SecOps, and where leaders are focusing their time and efforts to support a growing digital economy. Download it today!
Video
Current Issue
Monitoring Critical Cloud Workloads Report
In this report, our experts will discuss how to advance your ability to monitor critical workloads as they move about the various cloud platforms in your company.
Slideshows
Flash Poll